Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on workflow in radiology and pathology departments
- PMID: 17567904
- PMCID: PMC1919390
- DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-5-15
Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on workflow in radiology and pathology departments
Abstract
Background: The development of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) for radiology and pathology is a burgeoning area that increasingly impacts on work processes in both of these departments. The aim of this study was to examine work processes and quantify the time demands on radiologists and pathologists associated with MDTM practices at a large teaching hospital. The observations reported in this paper reflect a general trend affecting hospitals and our conclusions will have relevance for others implementing clinical practice guidelines.
Methods: For one month, all work related to clinical meetings between pathology and radiology with clinical staff was documented and later analysed.
Results: The number of meetings to which pathology and radiology contribute at a large university teaching hospital, ranges from two to eight per day, excluding grand rounds, and amounts to approximately 50 meetings per month for each department. For one month, over 300 h were spent by pathologists and radiologists on 81 meetings, where almost 1000 patients were discussed. For each meeting hour, there were, on average, 2.4 pathology hours and 2 radiology hours spent in preparation. Two to three meetings per week are conducted over a teleconferencing link. Average meeting time is 1 h. Preparation time per meeting ranges from 0.3 to 6 h for pathology, and 0.5 to 4 for radiology. The review process in preparation for meetings improves internal quality standards. Materials produced externally (for example imaging) can amount to almost 50% of the material to be reviewed on a single patient. The number of meetings per month has increased by 50% over the past two years. Further increase is expected in both the numbers and duration of meetings when scheduling issues are resolved. A changing trend in the management of referred patients with the development of MDTMs and the introduction of teleconferencing was noted.
Conclusion: Difficulties are being experienced by pathology and radiology departments participating fully in several multidisciplinary teams. Time spent at meetings, and in preparation for MDTMs is significant. Issues of timing and the coordination of materials to be reviewed are sometimes irreconcilable. The exchange of patient materials with outside institutions is a cause for concern when full data are not made available in a timely fashion. The process of preparation for meetings is having a positive influence on quality, but more resources are needed in pathology and radiology to realise the full benefits of multidisciplinary team working.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The proliferation of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs): how can radiology departments continue to support them all?Eur Radiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):3679-84. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3760-x. Epub 2015 May 1. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25929943
-
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53. Radiol Manage. 2003. PMID: 12800564
-
What is the added value of specialist radiology review of multidisciplinary team meeting cases in a tertiary care center?Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6460-6465. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10680-0. Epub 2024 Mar 15. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38488969 Free PMC article.
-
Effective radiology teams.J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Feb;2(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.07.020. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005. PMID: 17411785 Review.
-
Quality initiatives: lean approach to improving performance and efficiency in a radiology department.Radiographics. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):573-87. doi: 10.1148/rg.322115128. Epub 2012 Feb 8. Radiographics. 2012. PMID: 22323617 Review.
Cited by
-
Input of Psychosocial Information During Multidisciplinary Team Meetings at Medical Oncology Departments: Protocol for an Observational Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Feb 26;7(2):e64. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9239. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018. PMID: 29483068 Free PMC article.
-
Current concepts and dilemmas in idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.F1000Res. 2016 Nov 10;5:2661. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9601.1. eCollection 2016. F1000Res. 2016. PMID: 27853529 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multidisciplinary team decision-making in cancer and the absent patient: a qualitative study.BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 21;6(7):e012559. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012559. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27443554 Free PMC article.
-
[Integrated care concepts and multidisciplinary process chains in a radiological context].Radiologe. 2022 Apr;62(4):331-342. doi: 10.1007/s00117-022-00976-x. Epub 2022 Feb 24. Radiologe. 2022. PMID: 35201396 Review. German.
-
What is a virtual multidisciplinary team (vMDT)?Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 25;108(12):2433-41. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.231. Epub 2013 Jun 11. Br J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23756866 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ruhstaller T, Roe H, Thürlimann B, Nicholl JJ. The multidisciplinary meeting: an indispensable aid to communication between different specialities. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:2459–2462. - PubMed
-
- Batchelor I, McFarlane J. Multi-Disciplinary Clinical Teams. Based on working papers of the Royal Commission on the NHS, King's Fund Project paper No. RC12, King's Fund; 1980.
-
- Calman K, Hine D. A Policy Framework for Commissioning Cancer Services. London: Department of Health, Welsh Office; 1995.
-
- NCCAC . The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. NICE, clinical guideline 24; 2005. http://www.rcseng.ac.uk
-
- Rasmussen PC, Bulow S. Future organisation of colorectal cancer surgery in Denmark (in Danish) Ugeskr Laeger. 2005;167:4191–4192. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous