Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jul;68(4):556-65.
doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.556.

Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students?

Clayton Neighbors  1 , Christine M Lee, Melissa A Lewis, Nicole Fossos, Mary E Larimer
Affiliations

Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students?

Clayton Neighbors et al. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: This research was designed to evaluate the relative contribution of social norms, demographics, drinking motives, and alcohol expectancies in predicting alcohol consumption and related problems among heavy-drinking college students.

Method: Participants included 818 (57.6% women) first-year undergraduates who reported at least one heavy-drinking episode in the previous month. In addition to providing demographic information (gender and fraternity/sorority membership) participants completed Web-based assessments of social norms (perceived descriptive norms regarding typical student drinking, injunctive norms regarding friends' and parents' approval), motives (social, enhancement, coping, and conformity), and expectancies and evaluations of positive and negative alcohol effects.

Results: Regression results indicated that descriptive and injunctive norms were among the best predictors of college student drinking. With respect to alcohol problems, results indicated that coping motives accounted for the largest proportion of unique variance. Finally, results revealed that alcohol consumption mediated the relationships between predictors and problems for social norms, whereas coping motives, negative expectancies, and evaluation of negative effects were directly associated with alcohol problems despite having relatively weak or null unique associations with consumption.

Conclusions: The results of this study substantiate social norms as being among the best predictors of alcohol consumption in this population and suggest that drinking to cope is a better predictor of problems. The findings are discussed in terms of practical prevention and treatment implications.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams CE, Nagoshi CT. Changes over one semester in drinking game playing and alcohol use and problems in a college student sample. Subst Abuse. 1999;20:97–106. - PubMed
    1. Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ Behav Human Dec Process. 1991;50:179–211.
    1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1980.
    1. Baer JS. Effects of college residence on perceived norms for alcohol consumption: An examination of the first year in college. Psychol Addict Behav. 1994;8:43–50.
    1. Baer JS. Student factors: Understanding individual variation in college drinking. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;(Supplement No 14):40–53. - PubMed

Publication types