Congenital disabilities and the law
- PMID: 17572233
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2007.03.004
Congenital disabilities and the law
Abstract
This article describes the evolution and stutter steps in the legal developments surrounding the controversial claims for "wrongful conception," "wrongful birth," and "wrongful life." These claims arise from negligence in a failed vasectomy/tubal ligation resulting in an unwanted pregnancy and from negligence in failing to perform or properly interpret genetic testing resulting in the inability of parents to make an informed decision whether to terminate a pregnancy where a child would be, and ultimately is, born with serious genetic defects.
Similar articles
-
A critique of the motivational analysis in wrongful conception cases.Boston Coll Law Rev. 2000 May;41(3):585-626. Boston Coll Law Rev. 2000. PMID: 16379092
-
Wrongful birth and wrongful conception: a parent's need for a cause of action.J Law Health. 2000-2001;15(1):105-20. J Law Health. 2000. PMID: 11930501 No abstract available.
-
Wrongful birth and wrongful life actions.Eur J Health Law. 2004 Mar;11(1):55-9. doi: 10.1163/157180904323042344. Eur J Health Law. 2004. PMID: 15285194 No abstract available.
-
Cross-Country Comparative Analysis of Legislation and Court Rulings in Wrongful Birth Actions.J Leg Med. 2019 Jan-Mar;39(1):35-53. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2019.1596851. J Leg Med. 2019. PMID: 31141455 Review.
-
Preimplantation and prenatal diagnosis, wrongful birth and wrongful life: a global view of bioethical and legal controversies.Hum Reprod Update. 2017 May 1;23(3):338-357. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx002. Hum Reprod Update. 2017. PMID: 28180264 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical