Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jul;4(3):A52.
Epub 2007 Jun 15.

Charting plausible futures for diabetes prevalence in the United States: a role for system dynamics simulation modeling

Affiliations

Charting plausible futures for diabetes prevalence in the United States: a role for system dynamics simulation modeling

Bobby Milstein et al. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Healthy People 2010 (HP 2010) objectives call for a 38% reduction in the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes mellitus, type 1 and type 2, by the year 2010. The process for setting this objective, however, did not focus on the achievability or the compatibility of this objective with other national public health objectives. We used a dynamic simulation model to explore plausible trajectories for diabetes prevalence in the wake of rising levels of obesity in the U.S. population. The model helps to interpret historic trends in diabetes prevalence in the United States and to anticipate plausible future trends through 2010.

Methods: We conducted simulation experiments using a computer model of diabetes population dynamics to 1) track the rates at which people develop diabetes, are diagnosed with the disease, and die, and 2) assess the effects of various preventive-care interventions. System dynamics modeling methodology based on data from multiple sources guided the analyses.

Results: With the number of new cases of diabetes being much greater than the number of deaths among those with the disease, the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in the United States is likely to continue to increase. Even a 29% reduction in the number of new cases (the HP 2010 objective) would only slow the growth, not reverse it. Increased diabetes detection rates or decreased mortality rates--also HP 2010 objectives--would further increase diagnosed prevalence.

Conclusion: The HP 2010 objective for reducing diabetes prevalence is unattainable given the historical processes that are affecting incidence, diagnosis, and mortality, and even a zero-growth future is unlikely. System dynamics modeling shows why interventions to protect against chronic diseases have only gradual effects on their diagnosed prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Line graph
Figure 1
Diagnosed prevalence of diabetes per 1000 total population, United States, 1980–2003 (8), with Healthy People 2000 and Healthy People 2010 objectives (2,3), and simulation model output, for 2003–2010 (13).
Stock-and-flow diagram
Figure 2
Generic stock-and-flow structure for diagnosed prevalence of a disease.

References

    1. United States Public Health Service. Promoting health, preventing disease: objectives for the nation. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1980.
    1. United States Public Health Service. Healthy people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1990.
    1. United States Public Health Service. Healthy people 2010. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
    1. McGinnis JM. Setting nationwide objectives in disease prevention and health promotion: the United States experience. In: Holland WW, Detels R, Knox G, editors. Oxford textbook of public health. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1985. 1985.
    1. Mendez D, Warner KE. Smoking prevalence in 2010: why the healthy people goal is unattainable. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(3):401–403. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types