Evaluating the CSAPPA subscales as potential screening instruments for developmental coordination disorder
- PMID: 17573409
- PMCID: PMC2083620
- DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.115097
Evaluating the CSAPPA subscales as potential screening instruments for developmental coordination disorder
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we assess the potential of three subscales of the Children's Self-Perceptions of Adequacy in and Predilection for Physical Activity (CSAPPA), a measure of generalised self-efficacy, as possible screens for developmental coordination disorder (DCD).
Design: We used the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency short form (BOTMP-SF) to identify probable cases of DCD. We administered the BOTMP-SF and the CSAPPA to 590 children in grades 4-8 from four schools in the Niagara region of Ontario, Canada. We used receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess and compare the performance of the subscales and the full instrument.
Results: The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC), a measure of the overall performance of the test against a diagnostic standard, was good for the full CSAPPA (AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.87). The adequacy (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.85) and predilection (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.87) subscales had performance statistically equivalent to the full scale. Since the adequacy subscale is shorter and has good content validity with respect to DCD, we ran additional analyses on this measure. A cut-point of 24 on this subscale gives a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.97) and a specificity of 0.47 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.51).
Conclusion: The adequacy subscale of the CSAPPA appears to be equivalent to the full measure for the purposes of screening for DCD. Further research should explore the possibility of adding further criteria to improve the CSAPPA's modest specificity in this role.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of a screening instrument for developmental coordination disorder.J Adolesc Health. 2004 Apr;34(4):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.07.004. J Adolesc Health. 2004. PMID: 15041000
-
Screening for motor coordination challenges in children using teacher ratings of physical ability and activity.Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Apr;27(2):177-89. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Mar 17. Hum Mov Sci. 2008. PMID: 18343517
-
Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire for parents (DCD-Q): results from a community based study of school-aged children.Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Dec;27(6):932-40. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Jul 16. Hum Mov Sci. 2008. PMID: 18635280
-
Criterion Validity and Applicability of Motor Screening Instruments in Children Aged 5-6 Years: A Systematic Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;19(2):781. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020781. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35055607 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive validity of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire as a screening tool to identify motor skill problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Res Dev Disabil. 2024 Jul;150:104748. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104748. Epub 2024 May 13. Res Dev Disabil. 2024. PMID: 38744072
Cited by
-
Evaluating the impact of movement tracking feedback on engagement with home exercise programmes of children with cerebral palsy using a new therapy app: a protocol for a mixed-methods single-case experimental design with alternating treatments.BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 18;14(3):e082761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082761. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38503423 Free PMC article.
-
International clinical practice recommendations on the definition, diagnosis, assessment, intervention, and psychosocial aspects of developmental coordination disorder.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Mar;61(3):242-285. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14132. Epub 2019 Jan 22. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019. PMID: 30671947 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties - a systematic review.BMC Pediatr. 2019 Sep 7;19(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1657-6. BMC Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31493795 Free PMC article.
-
Activities of daily living, self-efficacy and motor skill related fitness and the interrelation in children with moderate and severe Developmental Coordination Disorder.PLoS One. 2024 Apr 23;19(4):e0299646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299646. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38652708 Free PMC article.
-
International clinical practice recommendations on the definition, diagnosis, assessment, intervention, and psychosocial aspects of developmental coordination disorder – Chinese (Mandarin) translation.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Jul;61(7):e1. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14274. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019. PMID: 31192464 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental health disorders – text revision. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA, 2000
-
- Kadesjo B, Gillberg C. Attention deficits and clumsiness in Swedish 7‐year‐old children. Dev Med Child Neurol 199840796–804. - PubMed
-
- Hay J, Missiuna C. Motor proficiency in children reporting low levels of participation in physical activity. Can J Occup Ther 1998664–71.
-
- Missiuna C, Rivard L, Pollock N. They're bright but can't write: developmental coordination disorder in school aged children. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus. 2004;1(1):article 3
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous