Concentration-effect relationship of ceftazidime explains why the time above the MIC is 40 percent for a static effect in vivo
- PMID: 17576831
- PMCID: PMC2043238
- DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01586-06
Concentration-effect relationship of ceftazidime explains why the time above the MIC is 40 percent for a static effect in vivo
Abstract
Growth-kill dynamics were characterized in vitro, and the parameter estimates were used to simulate bacterial growth and kill in vivo using both mouse and human pharmacokinetics. The parameter estimates obtained in vitro predicted a time above the MIC of between 35 and 38% for a static effect in mice after 24 h of treatment.
Figures


References
-
- Andes, D., and W. A. Craig. 2002. Animal model pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a critical review. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 19:261-268. - PubMed
-
- Bouvier d'Yvoire, M. J. Y., and P. H. Maire. 1996. Dosageregimens of antibacterials. Implications of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Clin. Drug Investig. 11:229-239.
-
- Craig, W. A. 2003. Basic pharmacodynamics of antibacterials with clinical applications to the use of beta-lactams, glycopeptides, and linezolid. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 17:479-501. - PubMed
-
- Craig, W. A. 1998. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:1-12. - PubMed
-
- Leggett, J. E., B. Fantin, S. Ebert, K. Totsuka, B. Vogelman, W. Calame, H. Mattie, and W. A. Craig. 1989. Comparative antibiotic dose-effect relations at several dosing intervals in murine pneumonitis and thigh-infection models. J. Infect. Dis. 159:281-292. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical