How to read the new recommendation statement: methods update from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- PMID: 17576997
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-2-200707170-00171
How to read the new recommendation statement: methods update from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Abstract
Since 2001, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has worked to refine its methods of evidence review and assessment and to create more usable documents in response to clinicians' needs. These changes have resulted in a revised grading system, as well as a new format and new language for the recommendation statement. This paper focuses on the changes to and the new look of the USPSTF recommendation statement. The new recommendation statement comprises 9 sections. Important changes include standardization of the format of the summary statement to specify what service is being recommended in what population; standardization of the headings in the rationale section; a change in the wording of the grade C recommendation and the I statement; and a new section, called "Other Considerations," in which salient issues related to cost-effectiveness, mandates, and other implementation issues are described.
Similar articles
-
Current processes of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: refining evidence-based recommendation development.Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 17;147(2):117-22. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-2-200707170-00170. Epub 2007 Jun 18. Ann Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17576998
-
Developing Recommendations for Evidence-Based Clinical Preventive Services for Diverse Populations: Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 18;166(8):565-571. doi: 10.7326/M16-2656. Epub 2017 Mar 7. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28265649
-
Update on the methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: insufficient evidence.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Feb 3;150(3):199-205. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-3-200902030-00010. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19189910
-
Screening for primary hypertension in children and adolescents: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Pediatrics. 2013 Nov;132(5):907-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2864. Epub 2013 Oct 7. Pediatrics. 2013. PMID: 24101758 Review.
-
USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination-Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting.Am J Mens Health. 2018 Sep;12(5):1510-1516. doi: 10.1177/1557988318768597. Epub 2018 May 2. Am J Mens Health. 2018. PMID: 29717912 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A guide to the Canadian Medical Association handbook on clinical practice guidelines.CMAJ. 2007 Nov 6;177(10):1221-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070880. CMAJ. 2007. PMID: 17984472 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Are current scoliosis school screening recommendations evidence-based and up to date? A best evidence synthesis umbrella review.Eur Spine J. 2014 Dec;23(12):2572-85. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3307-x. Epub 2014 Apr 29. Eur Spine J. 2014. PMID: 24777669
-
Could media reports include a standardized scale for quality of evidence?J Gen Intern Med. 2011 May;26(5):543-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1599-z. J Gen Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21174164 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biopsy of soft tissue masses: evidence-based medicine for the musculoskeletal tumor society.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Nov;467(11):2783-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0965-9. Epub 2009 Jul 14. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. PMID: 19597901 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A multifaceted knowledge translation strategy can increase compliance with guideline recommendations for mechanical bowel preparation.J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jan;19(1):39-44; discussion 44-5. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2641-y. Epub 2014 Sep 20. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015. PMID: 25238813
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources