Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr;136(4):520-4.
doi: 10.1017/S0950268807008953. Epub 2007 Jun 20.

Probability risk transmission matrix as a decision tool for assessing methods of transmission interruption of Wuchereria bancrofti infection

Affiliations

Probability risk transmission matrix as a decision tool for assessing methods of transmission interruption of Wuchereria bancrofti infection

P K DAS et al. Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Lymphatic filariasis continues to cause severe morbidity and economic loss. The World Health Assembly (WHA) has passed a resolution to eliminate this disease by 2020. The major thrust of the elimination strategy is interrupting transmission by anti-parasitic treatment of entire communities. However, both vector density and community microfilaria load (CMFL) influence the intensity of transmission. Therefore, using a logistic regression approach a relationship has been established between the Risk of Infection Index (RII), vector density and CMFL. The present analysis indicates that there is no risk of transmission as long as the CMFL is maintained below 5 microfilaria (mf)/60 mm3 and the vector density per man-hour (MHD) is 25 and CMFL is <5 mf/60 mm3. In situations where CMFL is very high, parasitic control by mass administration may be cost effective in interrupting transmission. But at lower level of CMFL (<4 mf) and higher level of vector density it might be more cost effective to use vector control methods. A RII value <0.2 is considered to be the threshold for confirming interruption of transmission. Thus, the relationship has been depicted in the form of a probability matrix, which could be used for selecting an appropriate control strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig
Fig
Incidence of filarial infection in the 0–5 years age group by risk probability.formula image, Observed; —, predicted. Incidence=−0·76+4·1×risk, R2=0·59, P=0·013.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Michael E, Bundy DAP, Grenfell BT. Re-assessing the global prevalence and distribution of lymphatic filariasis. Parasitology. 1996;112:409–428. - PubMed
    1. Michael E, Bundy DAP. Global mapping of lymphatic filariasis. Parasitology Today. 1997;13:472–476. - PubMed
    1. Ramaiah KD et al. The economic burden of lymphatic filariasis in India. Parasitology Today. 2000;16:251–253. - PubMed
    1. Ottesen EA, Campbell WC. Ivermectin in human medicine. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 1994;34:195–203. - PubMed
    1. Ottesen EA et al. Strategies and tools for the control/elimination of lymphatic filariasis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1997;75:491–503. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms