Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Jun 19;9(2):e17.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e17.

A field test of a web-based workplace health promotion program to improve dietary practices, reduce stress, and increase physical activity: randomized controlled trial

Royer F Cook  1 , Douglas W Billings, Rebekah K Hersch, Anita S Back, April Hendrickson
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A field test of a web-based workplace health promotion program to improve dietary practices, reduce stress, and increase physical activity: randomized controlled trial

Royer F Cook et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Most work sites engage in some form of health promotion programming designed to improve worker health and reduce health care costs. Although these programs have typically been delivered through combinations of seminars and print materials, workplace health promotion programs are increasingly being delivered through the Internet.

Objective: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Web-based multimedia health promotion program for the workplace, designed to improve dietary practices, reduce stress, and increase physical activity.

Methods: Using a randomized controlled trial design with pretest-posttest comparisons within each group, 419 employees of a human resources company were randomly assigned to the Web-based condition or to a condition that provided print materials on the same topics. All subjects were assessed at pretest and posttest through an online questionnaire containing multiple measures of health behavior and attitudes. The test period was 3 months. Questionnaire data were analyzed mainly by analysis of covariance and t tests.

Results: Retention rates were good for both groups-85% for the Web-based group and 87% for the print group. Subjects using the Web-based program performed significantly better than the print group on Attitudes Toward a Healthful Diet (F(1,415) = 7.104, P = .008) and Dietary Stage of Change (F(1,408) = 6.487, P = .01), but there were no significant group differences on the five other dietary measures. Both groups also showed improvement from pretest to posttest on most dietary measures, as indicated by significant t tests. Within the Web-based group, dosage analyses showed significant effects of the number of times the subject accessed the program on measures of Dietary Self-Efficacy (F(2,203) = 5.270, P = .003), Attitudes Toward a Healthful Diet (F(2,204) = 2.585, P = .045), and Dietary Stage of Change (F(2,200) = 4.627, P = .005). No significant differences were found between the two groups on measures of stress or physical activity, although t tests of pretest-posttest changes indicated that both groups improved on several of these measures. The Web-based group gave significantly higher ratings to the program materials than the print group on all health topics and in their overall evaluation (F(1,410) = 9.808, P = .002).

Conclusions: The Web-based program was more effective than print materials in producing improvements in the areas of diet and nutrition but was not more effective in reducing stress or increasing physical activity. The higher ratings given to the Web-based program suggest that workers preferred it to the print materials. Both groups showed numerous pretest-posttest improvements in all health topics, although such improvements might be attributable in part to a Hawthorne effect. Results suggest that a multimedia Web-based program can be a promising means of delivering health promotion material to the workforce, particularly in the area of diet and nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Web-based Health Connection program is owned by the Center for Workforce Health, LLC, in which two of the authors (Drs. Cook and Hersch) have a financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Health Connection screenshots
Figure 1b
Figure 1b
Health Connection screenshots
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT Flowchart, displaying the flow of participants from enrollment through analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pelletier Kenneth R. A review and analysis of the clinical and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: update VI 2000-2004. J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Oct;47(10):1051–8. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000174303.85442.bf.00043764-200510000-00012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ozminkowski Ronald J, Ling Davina, Goetzel Ron Z, Bruno Jennifer A, Rutter Kathleen R, Isaac Fikry, Wang Sara. Long-term impact of Johnson & Johnson's Health & Wellness Program on health care utilization and expenditures. J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jan;44(1):21–9. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200201000-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goetzel Ron Z, Ozminkowski Ronald J, Bruno Jennifer A, Rutter Kathleen R, Isaac Fikry, Wang Shaohung. The long-term impact of Johnson & Johnson's Health & Wellness Program on employee health risks. J Occup Environ Med. 2002 May;44(5):417–24. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200205000-00010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evers Kerry E. eHealth promotion: the use of the Internet for health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 2006;20(4):suppl 1–7, iii. - PubMed
    1. Wantland Dean J, Portillo Carmen J, Holzemer William L, Slaughter Rob, Mcghee Eva M. The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Nov 10;6(4):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40. http://www.jmir.org/2004/4/e40/v6e40 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types