Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales
- PMID: 17582037
- PMCID: PMC2658393
- DOI: 10.1136/emj.2007.046383
Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales
Abstract
Objective: To examine whether current validation methods of emergency department triage scales actually assess the instrument's validity.
Methods: Optimal methods of emergency department triage scale validation are examined in developed countries and their application to developing countries is considered.
Results and conclusion: Numerous limitations are embedded in the process of validating triage scales. Methods of triage scale validation in developed countries may not be appropriate and repeatable in developing countries. Even in developed countries there are problems in conceptualising validation methods. A new consensus building validation approach has been constructed and recommended for a developing country setting. The Delphi method, a consensual validation process, is advanced as a more appropriate alternative for validating triage scales in developing countries.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None
References
-
- Rutschmann O T, Kossovsky M, Geissbühler A.et al Interactive triage simulator revealed important variability in both process and outcome of emergency triage. J Clin Epid 200659615–621. - PubMed
-
- Lewis R J. Reliability and validity: meaning and measurement. Presented at 1999 Annual Meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) in Boston, Massachusetts. http://www.ambpeds.org/ReliabilityandValidity.pdf
-
- Jakobsson U, Westergren A. Statistical methods for assessing agreement for ordinal data. Scand J Caring Sci 200519427–431. - PubMed
-
- Fernandes C B, Groth S J, Johnson L A.et alA uniform triage scale in emergency medicine. American College of Emergency Physicians, 1999. http://www.acep.org/NR/rdonlyres/EE2B10F7‐51BE‐42A8‐94B7‐779726144017/0/...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources