Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007;3(1):165-71.

Effect of candesartan cilexetil on diabetic and non-diabetic hypertensive patients: meta-analysis of five randomized double-blind clinical trials

Affiliations
Review

Effect of candesartan cilexetil on diabetic and non-diabetic hypertensive patients: meta-analysis of five randomized double-blind clinical trials

Ramzi E L Féghali et al. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007.

Abstract

Objective: To study the effect of candesartan cilexetil (CC) in the management of blood pressure (BP) in diabetic and non-diabetic hypertensive patients.

Methods: A selection of five randomized double-blind clinical trials in which patients were treated for hypertension with CC was analyzed. All of these were similar in design: i) a 4-week placebo run-in period, ii) a 4- to 6-week period (V1) with CC 8 mg once daily (od), after which the dosage was doubled if BP was not normalized (BP > 140/90 or BP >130/80 mmHg in diabetes), and iii) a 4- to 6-week period (V2) with CC 8 or 16 mg od. Efficacy was measured at V1 and V2.

Results: 702 patients were screened. The population consisted of 397 males (56.6%) with a mean age of 60 +/- 11 years, with 153 diabetic (21.8%) and 549 non-diabetic (78.2%) patients. At baseline, mean BP values were 160/94/65 mmHg for SPB, DBP, and pulse pressure (PP) respectively, with differences between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. SBP, DBP, and PP values showed a significant reduction at V1 (p < 0.001) and V2 (p < 0.001) compared with baseline for all hypertensive patients. Mean changes at V2 in SBP and PP values were higher in diabetic than non-diabetic patients (p < 0.001), and to a lesser degree on DBP values (p = 0.034).

Conclusions: CC was effective in lowering BP in diabetic and non-diabetic hypertensive patients. CC is a promising therapy to manage hypertensive diabetic patients, as demonstrated by the significant BP reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP) compared with the baseline at V1 (4–6 weeks) and V2 (8–12 weeks) in the global population (a), hypertensive diabetic patients (b), and hypertensive non-diabetic patients (c) treated by CC 8–16 mg. Mean values are given, standard deviation is shown in parentheses.

References

    1. Asmar R, Vol S, Pannier B, et al. High blood pressure and associated cardiovascular risk factors in France. J Hypertens. 2001;19:1727–32. - PubMed
    1. Baguet JP, Nisse-Durgeat S, Mouret S, et al. A placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil, 8 mg, and losartan, 50 mg, as monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension, using 36-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60:391–8. - PubMed
    1. Bakris GL, Douglas J, Dworkin L, et al. Treatment of hypertension in adults with diabetes to preserve renal function: a consensus approach endorsed by the Scientific Advisory Board of the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36:646–61. - PubMed
    1. Bengtsson C, Blohme G, Lapidus L, et al. Do antihypertensive drugs precipitate diabetes. Br Med J. 1984;289:1495–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berne C, Pollare TG, Lithell H. Effects of antihypertensive treatment on insulin sensitivity with special reference to ACE inhibitors. Diabetes Care. 1991;14:39–47. - PubMed

MeSH terms