Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence
- PMID: 17584368
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01241.x
Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence
Abstract
1. As species are often considered discrete natural units, interspecific sexual interactions are often disregarded as potential factors determining community composition. Nevertheless reproductive interference, ranging from signal jamming to hybridization, can have significant costs for species sharing similar signal channels. 2. We combined laboratory and field experiments to test whether the coexistence of two congeneric ground-hopper species with overlapping ranges might be influenced by sexual interactions. 3. In the laboratory experiment the number of conspecific copulations of Tetrix ceperoi decreased substantially in the presence of Tetrix subulata. Males of T. ceperoi performed more mating attempts with heterospecific females, whereas females of T. subulata rejected these heterospecific approaches more often than those of conspecifics. Although no heterospecific matings occurred in the laboratory, the reproductive success of T. ceperoi was reduced substantially in field experiments. Negative effects on T. subulata were found only at high densities. 4. Our results suggest that reproductive interference could have similar consequences as competition, such as demographic displacement of one species ('sexual exclusion'). As reproductive interference should be selected against, it may also drive the evolution of signals (reproductive character displacement) or promote habitat, spatial or temporal segregation.
Similar articles
-
Reproductive interference between the common ground-hopper Tetrix undulata and the slender ground-hopper Tetrix subulata (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae).Bull Entomol Res. 2008 Dec;98(6):605-12. doi: 10.1017/S0007485308005907. Bull Entomol Res. 2008. PMID: 19012803
-
Reproductive interference between animal species.Q Rev Biol. 2008 Sep;83(3):257-82. doi: 10.1086/590510. Q Rev Biol. 2008. PMID: 18792662 Review.
-
Reproductive interference determines persistence and exclusion in species interactions.J Anim Ecol. 2009 Sep;78(5):1043-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01560.x. Epub 2009 May 13. J Anim Ecol. 2009. PMID: 19457018
-
Ecological character displacement caused by reproductive interference.J Theor Biol. 2007 Jul 21;247(2):354-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.03.013. Epub 2007 Mar 14. J Theor Biol. 2007. PMID: 17448500
-
An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 May;83(2):151-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00037.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008. PMID: 18429767 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of mechanisms of reproductive interference in Taraxacum.Ann Bot. 2019 Jun 24;123(6):1017-1027. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz007. Ann Bot. 2019. PMID: 30715137 Free PMC article.
-
Do native brown trout and non-native brook trout interact reproductively?Naturwissenschaften. 2008 Jul;95(7):647-54. doi: 10.1007/s00114-008-0370-3. Epub 2008 Mar 13. Naturwissenschaften. 2008. PMID: 18338149
-
Reproductive isolation between Stigmaeopsis celarius and its sibling species sympatrically inhabiting bamboo (Pleioblastus spp.) plants.Exp Appl Acarol. 2015 May;66(1):11-23. doi: 10.1007/s10493-014-9865-0. Epub 2014 Nov 30. Exp Appl Acarol. 2015. PMID: 25433761
-
Morphological variation and reproductive isolation in the Hetaerina americana species complex.Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 28;12(1):10888. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14866-8. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35764791 Free PMC article.
-
Pesticide-mediated displacement of a phytoseiid predator, Neoseiulus womersleyi, by another phytoseiid predator, N. californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae).Exp Appl Acarol. 2016 Aug;69(4):453-64. doi: 10.1007/s10493-016-0053-2. Epub 2016 May 20. Exp Appl Acarol. 2016. PMID: 27207574
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials