Cross calibration of Hologic QDR2000 and GE Lunar Prodigy for forearm bone mineral density measurements
- PMID: 17584510
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.05.003
Cross calibration of Hologic QDR2000 and GE Lunar Prodigy for forearm bone mineral density measurements
Erratum in
- J Clin Densitom. 2008 Jan-Mar;11(1):207
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to carry out an in vivo cross calibration for forearm bone mineral density (BMD) between a Hologic QDR2000 (Hologic Inc., Bedford MA, USA) and Lunar Prodigy (GE Healthcare, Madison WI, USA) during equipment upgrade. Nineteen subjects (17 females and 2 males, mean age 57 yr, range: 42-79yr) attending for routine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning were recruited. BMD of the nondominant forearm was measured on both instruments. Cross-calibration equations were derived for total forearm, ultradistal radius and ulna, and 33% radius and ulna. A Bland & Altman plot was used to calculate the mean difference and limits of agreement between instruments. There were significant differences in BMD at all sites. The Prodigy BMD was 15% higher at the total forearm and 20-25% higher in the cortical regions of the 33% ulna and 33% radius. The differences are smaller in the ultradistal regions, as it appears that the Prodigy underestimates BMD at low BMD. The standard error of estimate about the cross calibration was such that it cannot be used to transfer individual patients between instruments, but could be applied to clinical trial data.
Similar articles
-
Cross calibration of Hologic QDR2000 and GE lunar prodigy for whole body bone mineral density and body composition measurements.J Clin Densitom. 2011 Jul-Sep;14(3):294-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 May 19. J Clin Densitom. 2011. PMID: 21600823
-
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry.J Bone Miner Res. 1992 Jul;7(7):841-6. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070714. J Bone Miner Res. 1992. PMID: 1642152
-
Can forearm bone mineral density be measured with dxa in the supine position? A study in Chinese population.J Clin Densitom. 2010 Apr-Jun;13(2):147-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.02.001. J Clin Densitom. 2010. PMID: 20435265 Clinical Trial.
-
[Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical practice and its trouble spots in bone mineral measurement].Clin Calcium. 2004 Dec;14(12):33-8. Clin Calcium. 2004. PMID: 15577171 Review. Japanese.
-
[Ossification of the antibrachial interosseous membrane caused by etretinate].Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1989;116(2):123-6. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1989. PMID: 2660707 Review. French. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Impact of reference point selection on DXA-based measurement of forearm bone mineral density.Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Nov 9;14(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0658-2. Arch Osteoporos. 2019. PMID: 31707587 Free PMC article.
-
Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Evaluation of the Bone Remodeling Effects of a Low-Modulus Composite Hip Stem After 2 Decades of Follow-Up.HSS J. 2023 Feb;19(1):69-76. doi: 10.1177/15563316221108182. Epub 2022 Jul 8. HSS J. 2023. PMID: 36776510 Free PMC article.
-
Opportunistic hand radiographs to screen for low forearm bone mineral density: a prospective and retrospective cohort study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 20;25(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07127-w. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 38378510 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical