Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: testing a theory of face perception
- PMID: 1758768
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03212229
Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: testing a theory of face perception
Abstract
Recognition of faces is more severely impaired by inversion than is recognition of other types of objects. This was originally interpreted as evidence for the existence of special face-recognition mechanisms. Recently, Diamond and Carey (1986) attributed the inversion effect to the use of second-order relational properties that are important for, but not unique to, face recognition. According to their hypothesis, face recognition differs from the recognition of most other objects in its dependence on second-order relational properties. This hypothesis was tested in two experiments by comparing the effects of inversion on the identification of dot patterns that differed in the extent to which they required the encoding of second-order relational properties. Identification of the second-order relational patterns was not more disrupted by inversion than was identification of first-order patterns. These results fail to support the hypothesis that second-order relational properties are responsible for the inversion effect.
Similar articles
-
Face-specific configural processing of relational information.Br J Psychol. 2006 Feb;97(Pt 1):19-29. doi: 10.1348/000712605X54794. Br J Psychol. 2006. PMID: 16464285
-
Expertise and configural coding in face recognition.Br J Psychol. 1989 Aug;80 ( Pt 3):313-31. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02323.x. Br J Psychol. 1989. PMID: 2790391
-
Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Aug;22(4):904-15. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.4.904. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996. PMID: 8756958
-
Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition.Br J Psychol. 1988 Nov;79 ( Pt 4):471-91. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1988.tb02747.x. Br J Psychol. 1988. PMID: 3061544 Review.
-
On the modularity of face recognition: the riddle of domain specificity.J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 Apr;17(2):256-75. doi: 10.1080/01688639508405122. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995. PMID: 7629271 Review.
Cited by
-
The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).J Comp Psychol. 2012 Nov;126(4):339-46. doi: 10.1037/a0027287. Epub 2012 Mar 5. J Comp Psychol. 2012. PMID: 22390621 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral and neural evidence of increased attention to the bottom half of the face in deaf signers.Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(2):125-39. doi: 10.3233/RNN-120233. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23142816 Free PMC article.
-
Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Feb;9(2):123-35. doi: 10.1038/nrn2314. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18200027 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Visual search for orientation of faces by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): face-specific upright superiority and the role of facial configural properties.Primates. 2007 Jan;48(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10329-006-0011-4. Epub 2006 Sep 13. Primates. 2007. PMID: 16969584
-
Role of features and second-order spatial relations in face discrimination, face recognition, and individual face skills: behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging data.J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1435-52. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1435. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17714006 Free PMC article.