Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;115(6):983-8.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.8991. Epub 2007 Jan 25.

In search of a common European approach to a healthy indoor environment

Affiliations

In search of a common European approach to a healthy indoor environment

Olaf C G Adan et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Increasingly, policymakers in Europe and around the world are realizing the importance of healthy indoor environments for public health. Certain member states of the European Union (EU) have already achieved successes in improving indoor environmental quality, such as controlling certain contaminants (e.g., environmental tobacco smoke) or developing nationwide policies that address indoor air generally. However, a common European approach to achieving healthy indoor environments is desirable for several reasons including providing a broader recognition of the problem of unhealthy indoor air, setting a policy example for all 27 EU member states, and achieving greater public health equity across the different European nations. In this article we address the question "Why is it so difficult in the EU to develop a coherent approach on indoor environment?" We identify and describe four main barriers: a) the subsidiarity principle in EU policymaking, introducing decentralization of decision making to the member states; b) fragmentation of the topic of the indoor environment; c) the differences in climate and governance among different member states that make a common policy difficult; and d) economic issues. We discuss potential lessons and recommendations from EU and U.S. successes in achieving healthier indoor environments through various policy mechanisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anonymous 2004. Conclusions of the International Conference European Environment and Health Action Plan, 2–3 December 2004, Egmond aan Zee, the Netherlands. Available: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/health/conf_en.htm [accessed 5 July 2006].
    1. Bolte G, Kohlhuber M. eds. 2005. PINCHE Project: Final Report WP5 Socioeconomic Factors. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Public Health Services Gelderland Midden.
    1. Bonnefoy X, Braubach M, Moissonnier B, Monolbaev K, Röbbel N. Housing and health in Europe: preliminary results of a pan-European study. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1559–1563. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borrás S, Jacobsson K. The open method of coordination and new government patterns in the EU. J Eur Public Policy. 2004;11 (2):185–208.
    1. Braubach M, Bonnefoy X. Housing and health: the Eastern European challenge. Open House Int. 2001;26(2):8–22.