Reporting of systematic reviews: the challenge of genetic association studies
- PMID: 17593896
- PMCID: PMC1896206
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040211
Reporting of systematic reviews: the challenge of genetic association studies
Conflict of interest statement
Comment on
-
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078. PLoS Med. 2007. PMID: 17388659 Free PMC article.
References
-
- The PLoS Medicine Editors. Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040147. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, Sampson M, Altman DG. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e78. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Khoury MJ, Little J, Gwinn M, Ioannidis JP. On the synthesis and interpretation of consistent but weak gene-disease associations in the era of genome-wide association studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2006. E-pub 20 December 2006. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2007. Human Genome Epidemiology Network (HuGENet). Available: http://www.cdc.gov/genomics/hugenet/default.htm. Accessed 24 May 2007.
-
- Bogardus ST, Jr, Concato J, Feinstein AR. Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic research: The need for methodological standards. JAMA. 1999;281:1919–1926. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources