Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov;56(11):1599-605.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.123596. Epub 2007 Jun 26.

Endoscopic treatment of post-surgical bile duct injuries: long term outcome and predictors of success

Philip R de Reuver  1 , Erik A Rauws, Mattijs Vermeulen, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Dirk J Gouma, Marco J Bruno
Affiliations

Endoscopic treatment of post-surgical bile duct injuries: long term outcome and predictors of success

Philip R de Reuver et al. Gut. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the short and long term outcome of endoscopic stent treatment after bile duct injury (BDI), and to determine the effect of multiple stent treatment.

Design, setting and patients: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary referral centre to analyse the outcome of endoscopic stenting in 67 patients with cystic duct leakage, 26 patients with common bile duct leakage and 110 patients with a bile duct stricture.

Main outcome measures: Long term outcome and independent predictors for successful stent treatment.

Results: Overall success in patients with cystic duct leakage was 97%. In patients with common bile duct leakage, stent related complications occurred in 3.8% (n = 1). The overall success rate was 89% (n = 23). In patients with a bile duct stricture, stent related complications occurred in 33% (n = 36) and the overall success rate was 74% (n = 81). After a mean follow up of 4.5 years, liver function tests did not identify "occult" bile duct strictures. Independent predictors for outcome were the number of stents inserted during the first procedure (OR 3.2 per stent; 95% CI 1.3 to 8.4), injuries classified as Bismuth III (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.91) and IV (OR 0.04; CI 0.003 to 0.52) and endoscopic stenting before referral (OR 0.24; CI 0.06 to 0.88). Introduction of sequential insertion of multiple stents did not improve outcome (before 77% vs after 66%, p = 0.25), but more patients reported stent related pain (before 11% vs after 28%, p = 0.02).

Conclusions: In patients with a postoperative bile duct leakage and/or strictures, endoscopic stent treatment should be regarded as the choice of primary treatment because of safety and favourable long term outcome. Apart from the early insertion of more than one stent, the benefit from sequential insertion of multiple stents did not become readily apparent from this series.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Giger U F, Michel J M, Opitz I.et al Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the swiss association of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 2006203(5)723–728. - PubMed
    1. Richardson M C, Bell G, Fullarton G M. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Br J Surg 199683(10)1356–1360. - PubMed
    1. Calvete J, Sabater L, Camps B.et al Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: myth or reality of the learning curve? Surg Endosc 200014(7)608–611. - PubMed
    1. MacFadyen B V, Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo A E.et al Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The United States experience. Surg Endosc 199812(4)315–321. - PubMed
    1. Savader S J, Lillemoe K D, Prescott C A.et al Laparoscopic cholecystectomy‐related bile duct injuries: a health and financial disaster. Ann Surg 1997225(3)268–273. - PMC - PubMed