Vinorelbine/carboplatin vs gemcitabine/carboplatin in advanced NSCLC shows similar efficacy, but different impact of toxicity
- PMID: 17595658
- PMCID: PMC2360329
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603869
Vinorelbine/carboplatin vs gemcitabine/carboplatin in advanced NSCLC shows similar efficacy, but different impact of toxicity
Abstract
This randomised phase III study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was conducted to compare vinorelbine/carboplatin (VC) and gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) regarding efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and toxicity. Chemonaive patients with NSCLC stage IIIB/IV and WHO performance status 0-2 were eligible. No upper age limit was defined. Patients received vinorelbine 25 mg m(-2) or gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin AUC4 on day 1 and three courses with 3-week cycles. HRQOL questionnaires were completed at baseline, before chemotherapy and every 8 weeks until 49 weeks. During 14 months, 432 patients were included (VC, n=218; GC, n=214). Median survival was 7.3 vs 6.4 months, 1-year survival 28 vs 30% and 2-year survival 7 vs 7% in the VC and GC arm, respectively (P=0.89). HRQOL, represented by global QOL, nausea/vomiting, dyspnoea and pain, showed no significant differences. More grade 3-4 anaemia (P<0.01), thrombocytopenia (P<0.01) and transfusions of blood (P<0.01) or platelets (P<0.01) were observed in the GC arm. There was more grade 3-4 leucopoenia (P<0.01) in the VC arm, but the rate of neutropenic infections was the same (P=0.87). In conclusion, overall survival and HRQOL are similar, while grade 3-4 toxicity requiring interventions are less frequent when VC is compared to GC in advanced NSCLC.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Vinorelbine and gemcitabine vs vinorelbine and carboplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. A phase III randomised controlled trial by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group.Br J Cancer. 2012 Jul 24;107(3):442-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.284. Epub 2012 Jul 3. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22759880 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized phase II study of carboplatin/gemcitabine versus vinorelbine/gemcitabine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) 0104.Cancer. 2006 Aug 1;107(3):599-605. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22024. Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16804877 Clinical Trial.
-
Phase III randomized trial comparing three platinum-based doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2002 Nov 1;20(21):4285-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.02.068. J Clin Oncol. 2002. PMID: 12409326 Clinical Trial.
-
Carboplatin and vinorelbine in untreated locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer. 2001 May;32(2):173-8. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00218-x. Lung Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11325488 Review.
-
Vinorelbine: a review of its use in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Drugs Aging. 2002;19(9):695-721. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200219090-00006. Drugs Aging. 2002. PMID: 12381238 Review.
Cited by
-
Vinorelbine in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Data From a Single-Institution Experience.Oncol Res. 2020 May 29;28(3):237-248. doi: 10.3727/096504019X15755437099308. Epub 2019 Dec 5. Oncol Res. 2020. PMID: 31806078 Free PMC article.
-
Muscle mass and association to quality of life in non-small cell lung cancer patients.J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017 Oct;8(5):759-767. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12206. Epub 2017 May 10. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017. PMID: 28493418 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical benefit of COX-2 inhibitors in the adjuvant chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Clin Cases. 2021 Jan 26;9(3):581-601. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.581. World J Clin Cases. 2021. PMID: 33553396 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing effectiveness with efficacy: outcomes of palliative chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer in routine practice.Curr Oncol. 2015 Jun;22(3):184-91. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2419. Curr Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26089717 Free PMC article.
-
Health-related quality of life in non-small-cell lung cancer: an update of a systematic review on methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials.J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):2104-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.3683. Epub 2011 Apr 4. J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21464420 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365–376 - PubMed
-
- Alberola V, Camps C, Provencio M, Isla D, Rosell R, Vadell C, Bover I, Ruiz-Casado A, Azagra P, Jimenez U, Gonzales-Larriba JL, Diz P, Cardenal F, Artal A, Carrato A, Morales S, Sanches JJ, de Las PR, Felip E, Lopez-Vivanco G (2003) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus a cisplatin-based triplet versus nonplatinum sequential doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Spanish Lung Cancer Group phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 21: 3207–3213 - PubMed
-
- Ardizzoni A, Tiseo M, Boni L, Rosell R, Fossella FV, Schiller JH, Paesmans M, Radosavljevic A, Paccagnella A, Mazzanti P, Bisset D (2006) CISCA (cisplatin vs carboplatin) meta-analysis: an individual patient data meta-analysis comparing cisplatin versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 24: 18S [Abstract]
-
- Bergman B, Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Kaasa S, Sullivan M (1994) The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trials. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 30A: 635–642 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous