Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Jul;39(7 Suppl):S7-15.
doi: 10.1038/ng2093.

Challenges and standards in integrating surveys of structural variation

Affiliations
Review

Challenges and standards in integrating surveys of structural variation

Stephen W Scherer et al. Nat Genet. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

There has been an explosion of data describing newly recognized structural variants in the human genome. In the flurry of reporting, there has been no standard approach to collecting the data, assessing its quality or describing identified features. This risks becoming a rampant problem, in particular with respect to surveys of copy number variation and their application to disease studies. Here, we consider the challenges in characterizing and documenting genomic structural variants. From this, we derive recommendations for standards to be adopted, with the aim of ensuring the accurate presentation of this form of genetic variation to facilitate ongoing research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lexicon of genomic variation. Descriptors of variation began in the realm of cytogenetics, followed by those from the field of molecular genetics and, most recently, by technologies such as those described in this perspective, which bridge the gap for detection of genomic variants (sometimes called cytogenomics55). The designation of the category ‘1 kb to submicroscopic’ is somewhat arbitrary at both ends, but is used for operational definition. In a broad sense, structural variation has been used to refer to genomic segments both smaller and larger than the narrower operational definition, as illustrated by the large bracket. The focus of recent discoveries has been the subgroup in the midrange (indicated with strong highlighting), but the gradation of shading illustrates that the biological boundaries may really encompass some forms of variation previously recognized from either cytogenetic or molecular genetic approaches. At the molecular level, SNPs can be identified that are representative of the underlying haplotype structure (tagSNPs). As structural variation becomes better integrated with the existing SNP-based linkage disequilibrium maps, it is likely that presence or absence of many structural variants will simply be inferred by typing selected SNPs,,.

References

    1. Feuk L, Carson AR, Scherer SW. Structural variation in the human genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006;7:85–97. - PubMed
    1. Freeman JL, et al. Copy number variation: new insights in genome diversity. Genome Res. 2006;16:949–961. - PubMed
    1. Sharp AJ, Cheng Z, Eichler EE. Structural variation of the human genome. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2006;7:407–442. - PubMed
    1. Iafrate AJ, et al. Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 2004;36:949–951. - PubMed
    1. Sebat J, et al. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science. 2004;305:525–528. - PubMed

Publication types