Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):22-8.

Variability in effective radiating area and output power of new ultrasound transducers at 3 MHz

Lennart D Johns  1 , Stephen J Straub, Samuel M Howard
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Variability in effective radiating area and output power of new ultrasound transducers at 3 MHz

Lennart D Johns et al. J Athl Train. 2007 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Context: Spatial average intensity (SAI) is often used by clinicians to gauge therapeutic ultrasound dosage, yet SAI measures are not directly regulated by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) standards. Current FDA guidelines permit a possible 50% to 150% minimum to maximum range of SAI values, potentially contributing to variability in clinical outcomes.

Objective: To measure clinical values that describe ultrasound transducers and to determine the degree of intramanufacturer and intermanufacturer variability in effective radiating area, power, and SAI when the transducer is functioning at 3 MHz.

Design: A descriptive and interferential approach was taken to this quasi-experimental design.

Setting: Measurement laboratory.

Patients or other participants: Sixty-six 5-cm(2) ultrasound transducers were purchased from 6 different manufacturers.

Intervention(s): All transducers were calibrated and then assessed using standardized measurement techniques; SAI was normalized to account for variability in effective radiating area, resulting in an nSAI.

Main outcome measure(s): Effective radiating area, power, and nSAI.

Results: All manufacturers with the exception of Omnisound (P = .534) showed a difference between the reported and measured effective radiating area values (P < .001). All transducers were within FDA guidelines for power (+/-20%). Chattanooga (0.85 +/- 0.05 W/cm(2)) had a lower nSAI (P < .05) than all other manufacturers functioning at 3 MHz. Intramanufacturer variability in SAI ranged from 16% to 35%, and intermanufacturer variability ranged from 22% to 61%.

Conclusions: Clinicians should consider treatment values of each individual transducer, regardless of the manufacturer. In addition, clinicians should scrutinize the power calibration and recalibration record of the transducer and adjust clinical settings as needed for the desired level of heating. Our data may aid in explaining the reported heating differences among transducers from different manufacturers. Stricter FDA standards regarding effective radiating area and total power are needed, and standards regulating SAI should be established.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison between transducer surface area and mean measured effective radiating area.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Performance standards for sonic, infrasonic, and ultrasonic radiation emitting products. Food and Drug Administration. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFRCFRSearch.cfm?CFR.... Accessed September 22, 2006.
    1. Fyfe MC, Parnell SM. The importance of measurement of effective transducers radiating area in the testing and calibration of “therapeutic” ultrasonic instruments. Health Phys. 1982;43:377–381. - PubMed
    1. AS T40-1969 for Ultrasonic Therapeutic Equipment. Parkville, Victoria, Australia: Standards Association of Australia; 3052.
    1. International Electrotechnical Commission. Testing and Calibration of Ultrasonic Therapeutic Equipment. Geneva, Switzerland: Bureau Central de la Commission Electrotechnique Internationale; 1963: Publication 150.
    1. Johns LD, Straub SJ, Howard SM. Analysis of ERA, power, intensity and field characteristics of ultrasound transducers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:124–129. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources