Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):609-15.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2318. Epub 2007 Jun 28.

Electronic health records in specialty care: a time-motion study

Helen G Lo  1 , Lisa P Newmark, Catherine Yoon, Lynn A Volk, Virginia L Carlson, Anne F Kittler, Margaret Lippincott, Tiffany Wang, David W Bates
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Electronic health records in specialty care: a time-motion study

Helen G Lo et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) have great potential to improve safety, quality, and efficiency in medicine. However, adoption has been slow, and a key concern has been that clinicians will require more time to complete their work using EHRs. Most previous studies addressing this issue have been done in primary care.

Objective: To assess the impact of using an EHR on specialists' time. DESIGN Prospective, before-after trial of the impact of an EHR on attending physician time in four specialty clinics at an integrated delivery system: cardiology, dermatology, endocrine, and pain.

Measurements: We used a time-motion method to measure physician time spent in one of 85 designated activities.

Results: Attending physicians were monitored before and after the switch from paper records to a web-based ambulatory EHR. Across all specialties, 15 physicians were observed treating 157 patients while still using paper-based records, and 15 physicians were observed treating 146 patients after adoption. Following EHR implementation, the average adjusted total time spent per patient across all specialties increased slightly but not significantly (Delta = 0.94 min., p = 0.83) from 28.8 (SE = 3.6) to 29.8 (SE = 3.6) min.

Conclusion: These data suggest that implementation of an EHR had little effect on overall visit time in specialty clinics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main patient chart summary in the Longitudinal Medical Record (LMR), our electronic health record.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Data entry form for the time-motion study. Major Categories are listed in bold with Minor Categories designated underneath. Every activity record was preceded by a time stamp, created with the “Now” button. An appropriate activity was selected, and “Add New Record” committed the activity entry to an official data log.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Institute of Medicine To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health SystemWashington D.C: National Academies Press; 2000. - PubMed
    1. Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM, Maharry K, Kohler RB, McDonald CJ. A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients N Engl J Med 2001;345(13):965-970. - PubMed
    1. Safran C. msJAMAElectronic medical records: a decade of experience. JAMA 2001;285(13):1766. - PubMed
    1. Adams WG, Mann AM, Bauchner H. Use of an electronic medical record improves the quality of urban pediatric primary care Pediatrics 2003;111(3):626-632. - PubMed
    1. Delpierre C, Cuzin L, Fillaux J, Alvarez M, Massip P, Lang T. A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach? Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16(5):407-416. - PubMed

Publication types