Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec;40(6):688-97.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.05.008. Epub 2007 May 18.

Effects of SVM parameter optimization on discrimination and calibration for post-procedural PCI mortality

Affiliations

Effects of SVM parameter optimization on discrimination and calibration for post-procedural PCI mortality

Michael E Matheny et al. J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Support vector machines (SVM) have become popular among machine learning researchers, but their applications in biomedicine have been somewhat limited. A number of methods, such as grid search and evolutionary algorithms, have been utilized to optimize model parameters of SVMs. The sensitivity of the results to changes in optimization methods has not been investigated in the context of medical applications. In this study, radial-basis kernel SVM and polynomial kernel SVM mortality prediction models for percutaneous coronary interventions were optimized using (a) mean-squared error, (b) mean cross-entropy error, (c) the area under the receiver operating characteristic, and (d) the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (HL chi(2)). A threefold cross-validation inner and outer loop method was used to select the best models using the training data, and evaluations were based on previously unseen test data. The results were compared to those produced by logistic regression models optimized using the same indices. The choice of optimization parameters had a significant impact on performance in both SVM kernel types.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Randolph AG, Guyatt GH, Carlet J. Understanding articles comparing outcomes among intensive care units to rate quality of care. Evidence Based Medicine in Critical Care Group. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:773–781. - PubMed
    1. Topol EJ, Block PC, Holmes DR, Klinke WP, Brinker JA. Readiness for the scorecard era in cardiovascular medicine. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:1170–1173. - PubMed
    1. Hunt JP, Meyer AA. Predicting survival in the intensive care unit. Curr Prob Surg. 1997;34:527–599. - PubMed
    1. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA. The value of measuring severity of disease in clinical research on acutely ill patients. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1984;37:455–463. - PubMed
    1. Mendez-Tellez PA, Dorman T. Predicting patient outcomes, futility, and resource utilization in the intensive care unit: the role of severity scoring systems and general outcome prediction models. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:161–163. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources