[Current status of the retroperitoneoscopic surgical approach in pediatric urology]
- PMID: 17601296
[Current status of the retroperitoneoscopic surgical approach in pediatric urology]
Abstract
Urologic pediatric retroperitoneoscopy has had three different stages that have conditioned, although not hindered, its development: 1) limited number of indications in the pediatric age, because pediatric surgery itself is not much invasive; 2) adaptation of the technological development from adult to children; 3) overcoming the controversies between laparoscopic and non laparoscopic pediatric surgeons. After overcoming these stages, retroperitoneoscopy has become an indispensable tool for the treatment of various diseases of the kidney, being nephrectomy the gold standard among the indications for ablation, and pyeloplasty among reconstructive, through a complete or assisted retroperitoneoscopic approach.
Similar articles
-
Current indications for laparoscopy and retroperitoneoscopy in pediatric urology.Surg Endosc. 2004 Nov;18(11):1559-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8272-0. Epub 2004 Oct 11. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 15931494 Review.
-
[Laparoscopy in pediatric urology].Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Jul-Aug;55(6):737-47. Arch Esp Urol. 2002. PMID: 12224172 Review. Spanish.
-
Minimally invasive surgery for urologic disease in children.Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007 Jan;4(1):26-38. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0677. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007. PMID: 17211423 Review.
-
Benefits of Retroperitoneoscopic Surgery in Pediatric Urology.Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Apr 3;19(5):33. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0777-0. Curr Urol Rep. 2018. PMID: 29616411 Review.
-
Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.200. Epub 2007 Aug 17. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17707427