Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Jul;33(7):394-9.
doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.017913.

Can evidence-based medicine implicitly rely on current concepts of disease or does it have to develop its own definition?

Andreas Gerber  1 , Frieder Hentzelt, Karl W Lauterbach
Affiliations
Review

Can evidence-based medicine implicitly rely on current concepts of disease or does it have to develop its own definition?

Andreas Gerber et al. J Med Ethics. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

Decisions in healthcare are made against the background of cultural and philosophical definitions of disease, sickness and illness. These concepts or definitions affect both health policy (macro level) and research (meso level), as well as individual encounters between patients and physicians (micro level). It is therefore necessary for evidence-based medicine to consider whether any of the definitions underlying research prior to the hierarchisation of knowledge are indeed compatible with its own epistemological principles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Sackett D L, Rosenberg W M C, Gray J A M.et al Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 199631271–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hofmann B. Complexity of the concept of disease as shown through rival theoretical frameworks. Theor Med 200122211–236. - PubMed
    1. Liberati A, Vineis P. Defining a proper background for discussing evidence‐based medicine. In: Meulen RT, Biller‐Andorno N, Lenk C, et al, eds. Evidence‐based practice in medicine and health care. A discussion of ethical issues. Berlin: Springer, 2005
    1. Bobbert M. Die Problematik des Krankheitsbegriffs und der Entwurf eines moralisch‐informativen Krankheitsbegriffs im Anschluss an die Moralphilosophie von Alan Gewirth. Ethica 20008405–440.
    1. In: Mazouz N, Werner MH, Wiesing U, eds. Krankheitsbegriff und Mittelverteilung. Beiträge zum Gesundheitsmanagement Bd. 8. Baden‐Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2004