ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 371. July 2007. Sterilization of women, including those with mental disabilities
- PMID: 17601925
- DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000263915.70071.29
ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 371. July 2007. Sterilization of women, including those with mental disabilities
Abstract
Sterilization, like any other surgical procedure, must be carried out under the general ethical principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, and justice. Women requesting sterilization should be encouraged to discuss their decision and associated issues with their husbands or other appropriate intimate partners. The physician who objects to a patient's request for sterilization solely as a matter of conscience has the obligation to inform the patient that sterilization services may be available elsewhere and should refer the patient to another caregiver. The presence of mental capacity does not, in itself, justify either sterilization or its denial. When a patient's mental capacity is limited and sterilization is considered, the physician must consult with the patient's family, agents, and other caregivers in an effort to adopt a plan that protects what the consulted group believes to be the patient's best interests while, at the same time, preserving, to the maximum extent possible, the patient's autonomy.
Similar articles
-
Involuntary sterilization of persons with mental retardation: an ethical analysis.Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9(1):21-6. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10053. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003. PMID: 12587134 Review.
-
Nonconsensual sterilization of the mentally disabled in North Carolina: an ethics critique of the statutory standard and its judicial interpretation.J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1996 Fall;13(1):79-111. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1996. PMID: 9068238 No abstract available.
-
Reproduction, ethics, and public policy: the federal sterilization regulations.Hastings Cent Rep. 1979 Oct;9(5):29-41. Hastings Cent Rep. 1979. PMID: 511523
-
The international medicolegal status of sterilization for mentally handicapped people.J Reprod Med. 1982 May;27(5):257-8. J Reprod Med. 1982. PMID: 7108860
-
ACOG committee opinion. Sterilization of women, including those with mental disabilities. Number 216, April 1999 (replaces number 63, September 1988, and number 73, September 1989). Committee on Ethics. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999 Jun;65(3):317-20. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999. PMID: 10428358 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Navigating Complexities: Social, Ethical & Medicolegal Dilemmas of Hysterectomy in Young, Unmarried Women with Disabilities.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Feb;75(1):89-91. doi: 10.1007/s13224-024-02043-y. Epub 2024 Aug 31. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025. PMID: 40092385
-
Contraceptive Practices and Reproductive Health Considerations for Adolescent and Adult Women with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Review of the Literature.Sex Disabil. 2019 Oct;37(4):541-557. doi: 10.1007/s11195-019-09600-8. Sex Disabil. 2019. PMID: 33005065 Free PMC article.
-
"Everything I know I learned from my mother...Or not": perspectives of African-American and white women on decisions about tubal sterilization.J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(3):312-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0887-3. Epub 2008 Dec 19. J Gen Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19107540 Free PMC article.
-
Ethics of a Mandatory Waiting Period for Female Sterilization.Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Jul;52(4):17-25. doi: 10.1002/hast.1405. Hastings Cent Rep. 2022. PMID: 35993104 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of race and ethnicity on receipt of family planning services in the United States.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jan-Feb;18(1):91-6. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0976. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009. PMID: 19072728 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical