Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jul 24;46(29):8498-516.
doi: 10.1021/bi700361u. Epub 2007 Jun 30.

DNA sequence modulates the conformation of the food mutagen 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline in the recognition sequence of the NarI restriction enzyme

Affiliations
Comparative Study

DNA sequence modulates the conformation of the food mutagen 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline in the recognition sequence of the NarI restriction enzyme

Feng Wang et al. Biochemistry. .

Abstract

The conformations of C8-dG adducts of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) positioned in the C-X1-G, G-X2-C, and C-X3-C contexts in the C-G1-G2-C-G3-C-C recognition sequence of the NarI restriction enzyme were compared, using the oligodeoxynucleotides 5'-d(CTCXGCGCCATC)-3'.5'-d(GATGGCGCCGAG)-3', 5'-d(CTCGXCGCCATC)-3'.5'-d(GATGGCGCCGAG)-3', and 5'-d(CTCGGCXCCATC)-3'.5'-d(GATGGCGCCGAG)-3' (X is the C8-dG adduct of IQ). These were the NarIIQ1, NarIIQ2, and NarIIQ3 duplexes, respectively. In each instance, the glycosyl torsion angle chi for the IQ-modified dG was in the syn conformation. The orientations of the IQ moieties were dependent upon the conformations of torsion angles alpha' [N9-C8-N(IQ)-C2(IQ)] and beta' [C8-N(IQ)-C2(IQ)-N3(IQ)], which were monitored by the patterns of 1H NOEs between the IQ moieties and the DNA in the three sequence contexts. The conformational states of IQ torsion angles alpha' and beta' were predicted from the refined structures of the three adducts obtained from restrained molecular dynamics calculations, utilizing simulated annealing protocols. For the NarIIQ1 and NarIIQ2 duplexes, the alpha' torsion angles were predicted to be -176 +/- 8 degrees and -160 +/- 8 degrees , respectively, whereas for the NarIIQ3 duplex, torsion angle alpha' was predicted to be 159 +/- 7 degrees . Likewise, for the NarIIQ1 and NarIIQ2 duplexes, the beta' torsion angles were predicted to be -152 +/- 8 degrees and -164 +/- 7 degrees , respectively, whereas for the NarIIQ3 duplex, torsion angle beta' was predicted to be -23 +/- 8 degrees . Consequently, the conformations of the IQ adduct in the NarIIQ1 and NarIIQ2 duplexes were similar, with the IQ methyl protons and IQ H4 and H5 protons facing outward in the minor groove, whereas in the NarIIQ3 duplex, the IQ methyl protons and the IQ H4 and H5 protons faced into the DNA duplex, facilitating the base-displaced intercalated orientation of the IQ moiety [Wang, F., Elmquist, C. E., Stover, J. S., Rizzo, C. J., and Stone, M. P. (2006) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 10085-10095]. In contrast, for the NarIIQ1 and NarIIQ2 duplexes, the IQ moiety remained in the minor groove. These sequence-dependent differences suggest that base-displaced intercalation of the IQ adduct is favored when both the 5'- and 3'-flanking nucleotides in the complementary strand are guanines. These conformational differences may correlate with sequence-dependent differences in translesion replication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Chart 1
Chart 1
Metabolic Activation of IQ
Chart 2
Chart 2
(A) C8-dG IQ Adducted NarIIQ1 Dodecamer, (B) C8-dG IQ Adducted NarIIQ2 Dodecamer, (C) C8-dG IQ Adducted NarIIQ3 Dodecamer, and (D) C8-dG IQ Adducta
Figure 1
Figure 1
Expanded plots from the aromatic proton–anomeric proton region of the 800.13 MHz NOESY spectrum for the modified NarIIQ1 and NarIIQ2 duplexes at 15 °C using a mixing time of 250 ms, showing sequential NOE connectivity. (A) Nucleotides C1–C12 of the NarIIQ1 duplex. (B) Nucleotides G13–G24 of the NarIIQ1 duplex. (C) Nucleotides C1–C12 of the modified strand in the NarIIQ2 duplex. (D) Nucleotides G13–G24 of the complementary strand in the NarIIQ2 duplex.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of expanded plots of the imino proton region of the 1H NOESY spectra for (A) the NarIIQ1 and (B) NarIIQ2 duplexes. In the bottom panels are expanded plots showing sequential NOE connectivity for the imino protons of base pairs T2·A23 to T11·A14 at 15 °C. The labels represent the imino proton of the designated base. In the middle panels are NOE connectivities between the imino protons and the base amino protons. The NOE cross-peaks involving the imino protons are labeled in the figure as follows: (A) (a′ and a) G22 N1H → C3 NH2-4b,e and (b′ and b) G5 N1H → C20 NH2-4b,e and (B) (a′ and a) G4 N1H → C21 NH2-4b,e and (b′ and b) G19 N1H → C6 NH2-4b,e. In the top panels are NOE connectivities between the imino protons and the IQ methyl protons. The IQ-DNA cross-peaks are labeled as follows: (A) 1, G22 N1H → X4 CH3; and 2, G5 N1H → X4 CH3; and (B) 1, G4 N1H → X5 CH3; and 2, G19 N1H → X5 CH3.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Assignments of the IQ proton resonances. Expanded plots from (A) the COSY spectrum and (B) the aromatic–aromatic region of the NOESY spectrum at 15 °C for the IQ-adducted NarIIQ1 duplex. Expanded plots from (C) the COSY spectrum and (D) the aromatic–aromatic region of the NOESY spectrum at 15 °C for the IQ-adducted NarIIQ2 duplex.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Tile plots showing NOE cross-peaks between nonexchangeable protons of DNA and IQ protons in the NarIIQ1 and NarIIQ2 duplexes. (A) NOE cross-peaks for the NarIIQ1 duplex: (a) C20 H2′ → IQ H9A, (b) C20 H2″ → IQ H9A, (c) G22 H5′ → IQ H9A, (d) C20 H3′ → IQ H9A, (e) C21 H4′ → IQ H9A, (f) C21 H1′ → IQ H9A, (g) C20 H1′ → IQ H9A, (h) C20 H8 → IQ H9A, (i) G17 H8 → IQ H9A, (j) G22 H1′ → IQ H4A, (k) G22 H1′ → IQ H5A, (l) X4 H1′ → IQ CH3, (m) G5 H1′ → IQ CH , (n) G5 H5′ → IQ CH3, (o) G22 N1H → IQ CH3, and (p) G5 N1H → IQ CH3. (B) NOE cross-peaks for the NarIIQ2 duplex: (a) G19 H2″ → IQ H9A, (b) G19 H3′ → IQ H9A, (c) G19 H1′ → IQ H9A, (d) C20 H1′ → IQ H9A, (e) C21 H6 → IQ H9A, (f) G19 H8 → IQ H9A, (g) C21 H1′ → IQ H4A, (h) C20 H2′ → IQ H5A, (i) C20 H2″ → IQ H5A, (j) G19 H2″ → IQ H8A, (k) C21 H4′ → IQ H5A, (l) C21 H5 → IQ H5A, (m) C21 H1′ → IQ H5A, (n) G19 H8 → IQ H8A, (o) X5 H1′ → IQ CH3, (p) C6 H1′ → IQ CH3, (q) C21 H1′ → IQ CH3, (r) C6 H4′ → IQ CH3, (s) G4 N1H → IQ CH3, and (t) G19 N1H → IQ CH3.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Expanded COSY contour plot at 15 °C establishing the connectivity between the H1′ and H2′ and H2″ protons. (A) NarIIQ1 duplex. The H2′ and H2″ protons of nucleotides C3, X4, G5, C20, C21, and G22 adjacent to the lesion site are connected by lines and labeled. (B) NarIIQ2 duplex. The H2′ and H2″ protons of nucleotides G4, X5, C6, G19, C20, and C21 adjacent to the lesion site are connected by lines and labeled.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Chemical shift changes of (A) aromatic protons H6 and H8 and (B) anomeric H1′ protons of the NarIIQ1 duplex and (C) aromatic protons H6 and H8 and (D) anomeric H1′ protons of the NarIIQ2 duplex, relative to the unmodified duplex, where Δδ = δmodified oligodeoxynucleotideδunmodified oligodeoxynucleotide (parts per million).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Stereoviews of 10 randomly seeded superimposed structures of the (A) NarIIQ1 and (B) NarIIQ2 duplexes emergent from rMD simulated annealing calculations, looking into the minor groove at the lesion site.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Distribution of Rx1 values calculated using CORMA (72). (A) Nucleotides C1–C12 of the modified NarIIQ1 duplex. (B) Nucleotides G13–G24 of the modified NarIIQ1 duplex. (C) Nucleotides C1–C12 of the modified NarIIQ2 duplex. (D) Nucleotides G13–G24 of the modified NarIIQ2 duplex. The black bars represent intranucleotide values and the gray bars internucleotide values.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Comparison of averaged refined structures, looking into the minor groove, and normal to the helix axis of the central segment: (A) NarIIQ1 duplex and (B) NarIIQ2 duplex. The NOEs defining the IQ orientation are indicated by the green dashed lines.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Average refined structure of the NarIIQ3 duplex, looking into the major groove, and normal to the helix axis of the central segment (63). The NOEs defining the IQ orientation are indicated by the green dashed lines.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Base stacking orientations of the NarI, NarIIQ1, NarIIQ2, and NarIIQ3 (63) duplexes. (A) Unmodified duplex detailing base stacking corresponding to the modified duplexes. (B) NarIIQ1, NarIIQ2, and NarIIQ3 (63) duplexes detailing base stacking between the base pair at the modified position and its 5′ neighboring base pair, with the 5′ neighboring base pair aligned as in the unmodified duplex.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Base stacking orientations of the NarI, NarIIQ1, NarIIQ2, and NarIIQ3 (63) duplexes. (A) Unmodified duplex detailing base stacking corresponding to the modified duplexes. (B) NarIIQ1, NarIIQ2, and NarIIQ3 (63) duplexes detailing base stacking between the base pair at the modified position and its 3′ neighboring base pair, with the 3′ neighboring base pair aligned as in the unmodified duplex.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wakabayashi K, Nagao M, Esumi H, Sugimura T. Food derived mutagens and carcinogens. Cancer Res. 1992;52:2092–2098. - PubMed
    1. Layton DW, Bogen KT, Knize MG, Hatch FT, Johnson VM, Felton JS. Cancer risk of heterocyclic amines in cooked foods: An analysis and implications for research. Carcinogenesis. 1995;16:39–52. - PubMed
    1. Sugimura T. Overview of carcinogenic heterocyclic amines. Mutat. Res. 1997;376:211–219. - PubMed
    1. Sugimura T, Wakabayashi K, Nakagama H, Nagao M. Heterocyclic amines: Mutagens/carcinogens produced during cooking of meat and fish. Cancer Sci. 2004;95:290–299. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kataoka H, Nishioka S, Kobayashi M, Hanaoka T, Tsugane S. Analysis of mutagenic heterocyclic amines in cooked food samples by gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detector. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2002;69:682–689. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances