Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep;152(1):122-31.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707368. Epub 2007 Jul 2.

Myosin light chain kinase-independent inhibition by ML-9 of murine TRPC6 channels expressed in HEK293 cells

Affiliations

Myosin light chain kinase-independent inhibition by ML-9 of murine TRPC6 channels expressed in HEK293 cells

J Shi et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) plays a pivotal role in regulation of cellular functions, the evidence often relying on the effects of extracelluarly administered drugs such as ML-9. Here we report that this compound exerts non-specific inhibitory actions on the TRPC6 channel, a transient receptor potential (TRP) protein.

Experimental approach: Macroscopic and single channel currents were recorded from transfected HEK293 cells by patch-clamp techniques.

Key results: Cationic currents elicited by carbachol (CCh; 100 microM) in HEK293 cells overexpressing murine TRPC6 (I(TRPC6)) were dose-dependently inhibited by externally applied ML-9 (IC(50)=7.8 microM). This inhibition was voltage-dependent and occurred as fast as external Na(+) removal. Another MLCK inhibitor, wortmannin (3 microM), and MLCK inhibitory peptides MLCK-IP(11-19) (10 microM) and -IP(480-501) (1 microM) showed little effects on I(TRPC6) density and the inhibitory efficacy of ML-9. The extent of the inhibition also unchanged with co-expression of wild-type or a dominant negative mutant of MLCK. Inhibitory effects of ML-9 on I(TRPC6) remained unaffected whether TRPC6 was activated constitutively or by a diacylglycerol analogue OAG (100 microM). Similar rapid inhibition was also observed with a ML-9 relative, ML-7. Intracellular perfusion of ML-9 via patch pipette, dose-dependently suppressed I(TRPC6). In inside-out patch configuration, bath application of ML-9 (and ML-7) rapidly diminished approximately 35pS single TRPC6 channel activities. Contrarily, currents due to TRPC7 expression were rapidly enhanced by externally applied ML-9 and ML-7, which was not prevented by MLCK inhibitory peptides.

Conclusion and implications: These results strongly suggest that ML compounds inhibit TRPC6 channels via a mechanism independent of inhibition of MLCK activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Inhibitory effects of ML-9 on TRPC6 current (ITRPC6). Nystatin-perforated recording in normal external solution with a holding potential: −60 mV. (a) Typical traces for the inhibitory effects of ML-9 of 10 μM (upper) and 100 μM (lower) on CCh (100 μM)-evoked ITRPC6. (b) Relationship between ML-9 concentration and relative ITRPC6 amplitude after inhibition. Relative amplitude is calculated as the ratio of current amplitudes 5 s after, to just before, application of ML-9. Data points are fitted by the Hill equation with non-linear least-square routine (IC50=7.8 μM, nH=1.0, n=4–6; see the Methods). (c) Expanded time courses of the effects of Na+ removal (NMDG substitution) and 100 μM ML-9 on ITRPC6. Representative of separate six experiments. Each current trace is normalized to its amplitude just before drug application and then superimposed. The time courses of the currents are fitted by an exponential function: I=I0 exp(−(tt0)/τ)+C (smooth curves), where I0, t0, τ and C denote the amplitude of drug-inhibited component, the onset of drug application, time constant of drug's effect and the steady level reached after drug application, respectively, and I0+C is set to be −1. τ Values (in seconds) in the figure indicate the results of best fit by non-linear least-square routine. CCh, carbachol; ML-9, [1-(5-chloronaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)homopiperazine, HCl]; NMDG, N-methyl D-glucamine.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Voltage-dependency of ML-9's effects on ITRPC6. (a) Current–voltage (IV) relationships of ITRPC6 before (bold curve) and during (dotted curve) application of 10 μM ML-9. These curves were constructed by applying a 2 s rising ramp voltage, which can be seen as short vertical deflections in Figure 1a. (b) Voltage-dependent effects of ML-9. The fraction of ITRPC6 remaining in the presence of 10 μM ML-9 is calculated from the IV curves in (a), and plotted against the membrane potential. Values near the reversal potential are omitted because of large scattering due to ‘division by zero'. (c) The fractions of ITRPC6 remaining after ML-9 inhibition at −100 and 100 mV averaged from seven different experiments. Paired t-test (n=7). ITRPC6, TRPC6 current; ML-9, [1-(5-chloronaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)homopiperazine, HCl].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Wortmannin was ineffective on ITRPC6. Nystatin-perforated recording at −60 mV. (a) Actual trace of ITRPC6. Wortmannin (WT) (3 μM) was introduced into the bath 5–10 min before application of CCh. In this experiment, WT was further applied after activation of ITRPC6 by CCh (100 μM), but no discernible change was observed. (b) Current density of ITRPC6 with and without pretreatment with 3 μM WT. P>0.05 with unpaired t-test (n=6). CCh, carbachol; ITRPC6, TRPC6 current.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Intracellular perfusion of MLCK-inhibitory peptides and dominant negative inhibition of MLCK did not affect the inhibitory efficacy of ML-9 on ITRPC6. Conventional whole-cell recording at −60 mV. To reduce the degree of desensitization, Ca2+-free rather than normal external solution was used as the bathing solution. (a) Representative trace for the extracellular ML-9 (10 μM) effects on ITRPC6 in the presence of 10 μM MLCK IP11–19 peptide in the pipette. (b) Summary of the effects of 10 μM MLCK IP11–19 and 1 μM MLCK IP480–501 on ITRPC6 density (n=7–11). (c) ML-9 concentration–inhibition curves for ITRPC6 with (solid) and without (nystatin-perforated recording; dotted; taken from Figure 1b) inclusion of MLCK inhibitory peptides (10 μM MLCK IP11–19 or 1 μM MLCK IP480–501). The solid curve is drawn according to the best fit of the data points with Hill equation (see Methods). IC50=10.1 μM; nH=1.0 (n=4–6). There was no statistically significant difference between two curves with ANOVA. (d and e) Influence of overexpression of wild type (wt-MLCK) or a dominant-negative mutant of MLCK (mut-MLCK) on current density of ITRPC6 (d; n=15–18) and inhibitory efficacy of ML-9 for ITRPC6 (e; n=8–11). (d) *P<0.05 from other columns with ANOVA and Bonferroni's t-test. ANOVA, analysis of variance; IP, inhibitory peptides; ML-9, [1-(5-chloronaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)homopiperazine, HCl]; MLCK, myosin light chain kinase.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Activation mode of TRPC6 did not affect the efficacy of ML-9 and ML-7. Conventional whole-cell recording at −60 mV with Ca2+-free external solution. (a) Representative traces showing the effects of ML-9 and ML-7 on basal (upper) and OAG (100 μM; lower)-induced ITRPC6. (b and c) Summary of the effects of ML-9 and ML-7 on basal ITRPC6 at 10 μM (b) and on OAG-induced ITRPC6 at three different concentrations (1, 10, 100 μM) (c). n=6–7. (d) Inhibitory efficacy of ML-7 for ITRPC6 with overexpression of wild type (wt-MLCK) or a dominant negative mutant of MLCK (mut-MLCK). n=8–11. *P<0.05. ML-7, [1-(5-iodonaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)homopiperazine, HCl]; ML-9, [1-(5-chloronaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)homopiperazine, HCl]; MLCK, myosin light chain kinase.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Concentration-dependent inhibition of ITRPC6 by intracellularly applied ML-9. ML-9 was included in the pipette under conventional whole-cell clamp (−60 mV), with bath containing Ca2+-free external solution. (a) Typical traces of ITRPC6 with intrapipette inclusion of 10 μM ML-9, which abolished the inhibitory effect of extracellularly applied ML-9 at the same concentration (upper), and of 30 μM ML-9, which strongly inhibited ITRPC6 (lower). (b) Summary of the effects of intracellularly applied ML-9 on ITRPC6 density. *P<0.05 with ANOVA and Bonferroni's t-test. n=5–8. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ML-9, [1-(5-chloronaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)homopiperazine, HCl].
Figure 7
Figure 7
Effects of ML-9 and ML-7 on single TRPC6 channels. Inside-out (I/O) patch recording with CCh (100 μM) in the pipette. To suppress K+ and Cl channels, 5 mM tetraethylammonium and 100 μM DIDS were also added in the pipette. (a) Actual traces at three different potentials (−50, 0 and 50 mV). Boxes on the right indicate all-points-in-open-state amplitude histograms with the results of Gaussian fit (smooth curves). (b) IV relationship for single TRPC6 channel. Linear regression of data points between −50 and 50 mV gives a unitary conductance of 33.4 pS (n=5–8), which is in good accordance with the value obtained previously (Shi et al., 2004). (c) Inhibition of single TRPC6 channel activity by 10 μM ML-9, which was applied rapidly into the bath at the bar. Two large vertical deflections indicate the electrical artefacts of a solenoid valve. (d) Summary of the inhibitory effects of 10 μM ML-9 and ML-7 on single TRPC6 channels. The extent of single-channel current inhibition by ML compounds was calculated as the ratio of mean currents (averaged for 2 s) 5 s after, to just before, application of the drugs. n=8–11. CCh, carbachol; DIDS, [4,4-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2-disulphonic acid, 2Na]; ML-7, [1-(5-iodonaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)homopiperazine, HCl]; ML-9, [1-(5-chloronaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)homopiperazine, HCl].
Figure 8
Figure 8
Enhancing actions of ML-compounds on macroscopic TRPC7 current (ITRPC7). Conventional whole-cell recording at −60 mV with Ca2+-free external solution. (a) Representative records of basal (upper) and CCh-induced (lower) ITRPC7 demonstrating the enhancing effect of ML-9 and ML-7. (b) Fractional change in ITRPC7 amplitude after rapid application of ML-9 and ML-7. n=6–8. (c) Ineffectiveness of MLCK inhibitory peptide (MLCK-IP480–501=1 μM) on the effects of extracellular ML-9 and ML-7 on CCh (100 μM)-induced ITRPC7. n=5–6. CCh, carbachol; IP, inhibitory peptides; ML-7, [1-(5-iodonaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)homopiperazine, HCl]; ML-9, [1-(5-chloronaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)homopiperazine, HCl]; MLCK, myosin light chain kinase.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akar F, Jiang G, Paul RJ, O'Neill WC. Contractile regulation of the Na+-K+-2Cl− cotransporter in vascular smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;281:C579–C584. - PubMed
    1. Aromolaran AS, Albert AP, Large WA. Evidence for myosin light chain kinase mediating noradrenaline-evoked cation current in rabbit portal vein myocytes. J Physiol. 2000;524:853–863. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bain J, Mclauchlan H, Elliott M, Cohen P. The specificities of protein kinase inhibitors: an update. Biochem J. 2003;371:199–204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beech DJ, Muraki K, Flemming R. Non-selective cationic channels of smooth muscle and the mammalian homologues of Drosophila TRP. J Physiol. 2004;559:685–706. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burdyga TV, Wray S. The effect of inhibition myosin light chain kinase by wortmannin on intracellular Ca2+, electrical activity and force in phasic smooth muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1998;436:801–803. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms