Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jul 1:7:132.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-132.

Health inequalities in Germany: do regional-level variables explain differentials in cardiovascular risk?

Juergen Breckenkamp  1 , Andreas Mielck, Oliver Razum
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Health inequalities in Germany: do regional-level variables explain differentials in cardiovascular risk?

Juergen Breckenkamp et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic status is a predictor not only of mortality, but also of cardiovascular risk and morbidity. An ongoing debate in the field of social inequalities and health focuses on two questions: 1) Is individual health status associated with individual income as well as with income inequality at the aggregate (e. g. regional) level? 2) If there is such an association, does it operate via a psychosocial pathway (e.g. stress) or via a "neo-materialistic" pathway (e.g. systematic under-investment in societal infrastructures)? For the first time in Germany, we here investigate the association between cardiovascular health status and income inequality at the area level, controlling for individual socio-economic status.

Methods: Individual-level explanatory variables (age, socio-economic status) and outcome data (body mass index, blood pressure, cholesterol level) as well as the regional-level variable (proportion of relative poverty) were taken from the baseline survey of the German Cardiovascular Prevention Study, a cross-sectional, community-based, multi-center intervention study, comprising six socio-economically diverse intervention regions, each with about 1800 participants aged 25-69 years. Multilevel modeling was used to examine the effects of individual and regional level variables.

Results: Regional effects are small compared to individual effects for all risk factors analyzed. Most of the total variance is explained at the individual level. Only for diastolic blood pressure in men and for cholesterol in both men and women is a statistically significant effect visible at the regional level.

Conclusion: Our analysis does not support the assumption that in Germany cardiovascular risk factors were to a large extent associated with income inequality at regional level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intervention regions of the German Cardiovascular Prevention Study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Residuals from multivariate models, systolic blood pressure, women.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Marmot MG, Shipley MJ, Rose G. Inequalities in death – specific explanation of a general pattern? Lancet. 1984;1:1003–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)92337-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marmot MG, Davey Smith G, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, White I, Brunner E, Feeney A. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet. 1991;337:1387–93. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93068-K. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ecob R, Davey Smith G. Income and health: what is the nature of the relationship? Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:693–705. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00385-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marmot MG, Kogevinas M, Elston MA. Social/economic status and disease. Ann Rev Public Health. 1987;8:111–35. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.08.050187.000551. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaplan GA, Keil JE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation. 1993;88:1973–98. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources