Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway by one anaesthetist at a district general hospital
- PMID: 17604305
- DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem172
Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway by one anaesthetist at a district general hospital
Abstract
Background: The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), introduced to UK practice in late 2001, offers potential performance and safety benefits over other airways such as the classic laryngeal mask airway. There are no large series reporting its use.
Methods: Data from a prospective, consecutive series of 1000 size 3-5 PLMA uses, by one anaesthetist, were analysed to examine whether performance in routine and advanced practice is similar to that reported in formal trials.
Results: Patients were female in 52% of cases, median age 52 (range 8-101) yr, median weight 78 kg (10% over 100 kg, 24% over 90 kg). Procedures included 12% laparoscopic and 5% open abdominal surgery. Overall insertion success was 99.4%, (first and second attempt success 85% and 12%, respectively). Median insertion time was 12 s (93% <30 s). Insertion success did not differ between genders, or between mask sizes. Median airway seal was 32 cm H(2)O (range 8-40, 94% seal >20 cm H(2)O). Specific tests confirmed correct positioning in 98.5% of cases. Of six failures, two occurred during management of difficult airways. Minor airway obstruction occurred in 2.7%. Blood was visible on 8% of removed PLMAs and more commonly after more than one insertion attempt (38 vs 4.7%, chi(2) P < 0.0001). In three cases minor regurgitation without aspiration occurred.
Conclusions: In the hands of a regular user, the PLMA was associated with a high rate of insertion success during routine and advanced use in relatively unselected patients. Correct placement rates approached 100%. The incidence of complications was low.
Similar articles
-
[The applicability of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for laparotomies].Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2005 Aug;40(8):477-86. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870103. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2005. PMID: 16078158 Clinical Trial. German.
-
A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children.Br J Anaesth. 2005 Dec;95(6):827-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei234. Epub 2005 Oct 6. Br J Anaesth. 2005. PMID: 16210311 Clinical Trial.
-
A cohort evaluation of the pediatric ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 100 children.Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Oct;18(10):947-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02705.x. Epub 2008 Jul 21. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008. PMID: 18647270
-
The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature.Can J Anaesth. 2005 Aug-Sep;52(7):739-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03016565. Can J Anaesth. 2005. PMID: 16103390 Review.
-
Comparison of different techniques of laryngeal mask placement in children.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jun;22(3):400-4. doi: 10.1097/aco.0b013e3283294d06. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009. PMID: 19434792 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of leakage test and ultrasound imaging to validate ProSeal supraglottic airway device placement.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Apr-Jun;36(2):227-232. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_332_19. Epub 2020 Jun 15. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 33013039 Free PMC article.
-
All India Difficult Airway Association 2016 guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in adults.Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Dec;60(12):885-898. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.195481. Indian J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 28003690 Free PMC article.
-
Supraglottic airway devices versus tracheal intubation for airway management during general anaesthesia in obese patients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 9;2013(9):CD010105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010105.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24014230 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the size 3 and size 4 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, non-paralyzed women: a randomized controlled trial.J Anesth. 2015 Apr;29(2):256-62. doi: 10.1007/s00540-014-1916-5. Epub 2014 Sep 24. J Anesth. 2015. PMID: 25249429 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparision of Ambu AuraGain™ and LMA® ProSeal in children under controlled ventilation.Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;62(6):455-460. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_86_18. Indian J Anaesth. 2018. PMID: 29962528 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources