The rate of glove perforations in orthopaedic procedures: single versus double gloving. A prospective study
- PMID: 17605178
The rate of glove perforations in orthopaedic procedures: single versus double gloving. A prospective study
Abstract
Glove perforation during surgery has always been a matter of concern as it increases the infection rate and the risk of transmission of blood borne diseases. To determine the common causes, the site and the awareness of glove perforations in orthopaedic surgery, a prospective study was conducted to assess the rate of glove perforation during 130 consecutive orthopaedic operations. All gloves worn by the surgical team were assessed after the surgery using the water-loading test. A total of 1452 gloves were tested, and the rate of perforation was 3.58%. Most of these perforations (61.5%) were unnoticed. The main surgeons had the most perforations (76.9%), followed by first assistants (13.5%) and second assistants (9.6%). Most perforations occurred at the non-dominant hand. The commonest site of perforation was the index finger followed by the thumb. Shearing force with instruments accounted for 45% of the noticed perforations. Majority of these occurred during nailing procedures (33%) and internal fixation without the use of wires (19%). Our rate of glove perforation is similar to other series. Most of them went unnoticed and were mainly due to shearing injuries rather than perforation by sharps. Therefore, there is an increased risk of contamination and break in asepsis during surgery.
Similar articles
-
Prospective randomized assessment of single versus double-gloving for general surgical procedures.Niger J Med. 2009 Jan-Mar;18(1):73-4. Niger J Med. 2009. PMID: 19485153
-
Glove punctures in major and minor orthopaedic surgery with double gloving.Acta Orthop Belg. 2007 Dec;73(6):760-4. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007. PMID: 18260490
-
Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study.Eur J Surg. 2000 Apr;166(4):293-5. doi: 10.1080/110241500750009113. Eur J Surg. 2000. PMID: 10817324 Clinical Trial.
-
[Surgical gloves--how well do the protect against infections?].Gesundheitswesen. 1999 Aug-Sep;61(8-9):398-403. Gesundheitswesen. 1999. PMID: 10535220 Review. German.
-
[Defects in the surgical glove barrier. Single or double gloves].Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Mar 3;165(10):1016-9. Ugeskr Laeger. 2003. PMID: 12645406 Review. Danish.
Cited by
-
Reducing surgical site infection in arthroplasty of the lower limb: A multi-disciplinary approach.Bone Joint Res. 2013 Mar 1;2(3):58-65. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.23.2000146. Print 2013 Mar. Bone Joint Res. 2013. PMID: 23610703 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective data collection and analysis of perforations and tears of latex surgical gloves during primary endoprosthetic surgeries.GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2016 Dec 20;11:Doc25. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000285. eCollection 2016. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2016. PMID: 28066701 Free PMC article.
-
Glove perforation rate with orthopedic gloving versus double gloving technique in tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: A randomized trial.Can Vet J. 2016 Nov;57(11):1156-1160. Can Vet J. 2016. PMID: 27807378 Free PMC article.
-
CORR Insights®: High Risk of Surgical Glove Perforation From Surgical Rotatory Instruments.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2518-2521. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5004-z. Epub 2016 Aug 10. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 27511200 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Surgical glove perforation during intramedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures.Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84994-w. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39774284 Free PMC article.