Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jul;21(4):401-11.
doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.4.401.

Implications of within-person variability in cognitive and neuropsychological functioning for the interpretation of change

Timothy A Salthouse  1
Affiliations

Implications of within-person variability in cognitive and neuropsychological functioning for the interpretation of change

Timothy A Salthouse. Neuropsychology. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

Samples of adults across a wide age range performed a battery of 16 cognitive tests in 3 sessions within an interval of approximately 2 weeks. Estimates of within-person variability across the 3 assessments were relatively large and were equivalent in magnitude to the cross-sectional age differences expected over an interval of 15-25 years. These findings raise questions about the precision of assessments based on a single measurement and imply that it may be difficult to distinguish true change from short-term fluctuation. Because there were large individual differences in the magnitude of this variability, it is proposed that change might be most meaningfully expressed in units of each individual's own across-session variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of the ambiguity of change when there is variability in level of performance at each measurement occasion (i.e., T1 and T2). The right panel portrays the proposal to assess change in terms of the t value between the distributions of scores from the two occasions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average levels of within-person variability and of 10-year cross-sectional age differences for four cognitive abilities scaled in between-person standard deviation units.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Allaire JC, Marsiske M. Intraindividual variability may not always indicate vulnerability in elders’ cognitive performance. Psychology and Aging. 2005;20:390–401. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennett GK, Seashore HG, Wesman AG. Differential Aptitude Test. Psychological Corporation; San Antonio, TX: 1997.
    1. Burton CL, Strauss E, Hultsch DF, Moll A, Hunter MA. Intraindividual variability as a marker of neurological dysfunction: A comparison of Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2006;28:67–83. - PubMed
    1. Ekstrom RB, French JW, Harman HH, Dermen D. Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service; Princeton, NJ: 1976.
    1. Frerichs RJ, Tuokko HA. A comparison of methods for measuring change in older adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2005;20:321–333. - PubMed

Publication types