Withdrawal of COX-2 selective inhibitors rofecoxib and valdecoxib: impact on NSAID and gastroprotective drug prescribing and utilization
- PMID: 17605893
- DOI: 10.1185/030079907X210561
Withdrawal of COX-2 selective inhibitors rofecoxib and valdecoxib: impact on NSAID and gastroprotective drug prescribing and utilization
Abstract
Objective: Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors rofecoxib and valdecoxib were withdrawn from the market because of their association with cardiovascular problems. There is a lack of information on the impact of the COX-2 inhibitors withdrawal on the prescribing and utilization of related drugs. The main objective of this study was to evaluate to what extent prescriptions of non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and gastroprotective drugs changed after the removal of the two COX-2 inhibitors.
Research design and methods: A segmented regression of interrupted time series approach was used to analyze prescription data from July 1, 2003 through December 31, 2005 from a pharmacy claims database maintained by a large pharmacy benefit manager (PBM). Patients continuously eligible for the pharmacy benefit but not enrolled in COX-2 or proton pump inhibitor (PPI) Step Care programs during the study period were included. The number of prescriptions per thousand patients per month for targeted drugs were analyzed and compared.
Results: A total of 175 193 patients were included in the analysis. After the withdrawal of the COX-2 inhibitor, the average monthly non-selective NSAID and PPI prescriptions per thousand patients increased from 13.96 to 19.63 (a change of 40.62%, p < 0.0001) and from 38.67 to 43.33 (a change of 12.05%, p < 0.0001) respectively, whereas COX-2 prescriptions decreased by 54.51% (from 23.61 to 10.74, p < 0.0001). Among non-selective NSAIDs, the five drugs with highest percentage increase were meloxicam (167.12%, from 1.46 to 3.90, p < 0.0001), etodolac (72.06%, from 0.68 to 1.17, p < 0.0001), piroxicam (58.33%, from 0.36 to 0.57, p < 0.0001), nabumetone (52.38%, from 1.26 to 1.92, p < 0.0001), and diclofenac (37.89%, from 1.61 to 2.22, p < 0.0001).
Limitations: This study was restricted to patients with employer-sponsored drug coverage which might not be representative of the national population. Since over-the-counter (OTC) PPI, non-selective NSAID and H2RA were not captured in our claims data, we were unable to examine whether and to what extent the utilization of these drugs has changed. Additionally, the direct impact of these changes on population based outcomes is unknown.
Conclusions: After the withdrawal of COX-2 inhibitors rofecoxib and valdecoxib, there were significant increases in non-selective NSAID and PPI prescriptions but not H2RA and misoprostol. Given the safety concerns with the NSAIDs, further studies are warranted regarding the clinical outcomes associated with the increased use of non-selective NSAIDs with or without gastroprotective agents.
Similar articles
-
Underutilization of preventive strategies in patients receiving NSAIDs.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Nov;42 Suppl 3:iii23-31. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg495. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003. PMID: 14585915
-
Changes in physicians' practice of prescribing cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor after market withdrawal of rofecoxib: a retrospective study of physician-patient pairs in Taiwan.Clin Ther. 2009 Nov;31(11):2618-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.022. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 20110006
-
A regional audit of the use of COX-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in rheumatology clinics in the West Midlands, in relation to NICE guidelines.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jul;44(7):921-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh642. Epub 2005 Apr 12. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005. PMID: 15827035
-
Prescribing of COX-2 inhibitors in Germany after safety warnings and market withdrawals.Pharmazie. 2006 Oct;61(10):878-86. Pharmazie. 2006. PMID: 17069430 Review.
-
Celecoxib versus a non-selective NSAID plus proton-pump inhibitor: what are the considerations?J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2006;20(4):11-32. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2006. PMID: 17182503 Review.
Cited by
-
Perioperative bleeding and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: An evidence-based literature review, and current clinical appraisal.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 31;99(31):e20042. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020042. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32756071 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and pain in cancer patients: a systematic review and reappraisal of the evidence.Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e412-e423. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.028. Epub 2019 May 20. Br J Anaesth. 2019. PMID: 31122736 Free PMC article.
-
Pyrazoles as Anti-inflammatory and Analgesic Agents: In-vivo and In-silico Studies.Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem. 2024;23(1):39-51. doi: 10.2174/0118715230275741231207115011. Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem. 2024. PMID: 38828869
-
An observational study of the discrediting of COX-2 NSAIDs in Australia: Vioxx or class effect?BMC Public Health. 2011 Nov 24;11:892. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-892. BMC Public Health. 2011. PMID: 22114865 Free PMC article.
-
Anti-nociceptive and Anti-inflammatory Activities of Asparacosin A Involve Selective Cyclooxygenase 2 and Inflammatory Cytokines Inhibition: An in-vitro, in-vivo, and in-silico Approach.Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 26;10:581. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00581. eCollection 2019. Front Immunol. 2019. PMID: 30972073 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials