Does competence of general practitioners predict their performance? Comparison between examination setting and actual practice
- PMID: 1760606
- PMCID: PMC1671632
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.303.6814.1377
Does competence of general practitioners predict their performance? Comparison between examination setting and actual practice
Abstract
Objective: To study the differences and the relation between what a doctor actually does in daily practice (performance) and what he or she is capable of doing (competence) by using national standards for general practice.
Design: General practitioners were consulted by four standardised (simulated) patients portraying four different cases during normal surgery hours. Later the doctors participated in a controlled practice test, for which they were asked to perform to the best of their ability. In the test they saw exactly the same standardised cases but in different patients. The patients reported on the consultations.
Setting: Province of Limburg, the Netherlands.
Subjects: 442 general practitioners invited by a letter. 137 (31%) agreed to participate, of whom 36 were selected and visited.
Main outcome measures: Number of actions taken during the consultations across complaints and for each category of complaint: the competence and performance total scores. Combination of scores with duration of consultations (efficiency-time score). Correlation between scores in the competence and performance part.
Results: Mean (SD) total score across complaints for competence was 49% higher than in the performance test (81.8 (11) compared with 54.7 (10.1), p less than 0.0001). The Pearson correlation across complaints between the competence total score and the performance total score of the participating physicians was -0.04 (not significant). When efficiency and consultation time of the consultations were taken into account, the correlation was 0.45 (p less than 0.01).
Conclusions: Assessment of competence under examination circumstances can have predictive value for performance in actual practice only when factors such as efficiency and consultation time are taken into account. Below standard performance of physicians does not necessarily reflect a lack of competence. Performance and competence should be considered as distinct constructs.
Similar articles
-
Do general practitioners act consistently in real practice when they meet the same patient twice? Examination of intradoctor variation using standardised (simulated) patients.BMJ. 1997 Apr 19;314(7088):1170-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7088.1170. BMJ. 1997. PMID: 9146391 Free PMC article.
-
To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients.Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Apr;44(381):153-6. Br J Gen Pract. 1994. PMID: 8185988 Free PMC article.
-
On the relationship between the efficiency and the quality of the consultation. A validity study.Fam Pract. 2001 Dec;18(6):592-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.6.592. Fam Pract. 2001. PMID: 11739343
-
Competence and performance: two different concepts in the assessment of quality of medical care.Fam Pract. 1990 Sep;7(3):168-74. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.3.168. Fam Pract. 1990. PMID: 2245885 Review.
-
Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice.BMJ. 1999 Oct 30;319(7218):1180-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7218.1180. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10541513 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
How to assess your specialist registrar.Arch Dis Child. 2004 Dec;89(12):1089-93. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.043232. Arch Dis Child. 2004. PMID: 15557038 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Integrating Xpert MTB/RIF for TB diagnosis in the private sector: evidence from large-scale pilots in Patna and Mumbai, India.BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05817-1. BMC Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33509114 Free PMC article.
-
General practitioners apply the usual care for shoulder complaints better than expected--analysis of videotaped consultations.BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Mar 29;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-13. BMC Fam Pract. 2007. PMID: 17394636 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational intervention for general practitioners in adolescent health care: randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2000 Jan 22;320(7229):224-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7229.224. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10642233 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Making reaccreditation meaningful.Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jun;45(395):321-4. Br J Gen Pract. 1995. PMID: 7619590 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources