Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug;60(8):757-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.023. Epub 2007 May 10.

Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants

Affiliations

Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants

Karen A Robinson et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Loss to follow-up threatens internal and external validity yet little research has examined ways to limit participant attrition. We conducted a systematic review of studies with a primary focus on strategies to retain participants in health care research.

Study design and settings: We completed searches of PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Cochrane Methodology Register, and EMBASE (August 2005). We also examined reference lists of eligible articles and relevant reviews. A data-driven thematic analysis of the retention strategies identified common themes.

Results: We retrieved 3,068 citations, 21 studies were eligible for inclusion. We abstracted 368 strategies and from these identified 12 themes. The studies reported a median of 17 strategies across a median of six themes. The most commonly reported strategies were systematic methods of participant contact and scheduling. Studies with retention rates lower than the mean rate (86%) reported fewer strategies. There was no difference in the number of different themes used.

Conclusion: Available evidence suggests that investigators should consider using a number of retention strategies across several themes to maximize the retention of participants. Further research, including explicit evaluation of the effectiveness of different strategies, is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of Search and Screening Results

References

    1. Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiology - Beyond the basics. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2004.
    1. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. St Louis: Mosby; 1995.
    1. Cassidy EL, Baird E, Sheikh JI. Recruitment and retention of elderly patients in clinical trials: issues and strategies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001 Spring;9(2):136–40. - PubMed
    1. Shumaker SA, Dugan E, Bowen DJ. Enhancing adherence in randomized controlled clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 2000 Oct;21(5 Suppl):226S–32S. - PubMed
    1. Coday M, Boutin-Foster C, Goldman Sher T, Tennant J, Greaney ML, Saunders SD, Somes GW. Strategies for Retaining Study Participants in Behavioral Intervention Trials: Retention Experiences of the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Ann Behav Med. 2005;29(2 Suppl):55–65. - PubMed

Publication types