Process evaluation in an intervention designed to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening in a VA medical center
- PMID: 17606952
- DOI: 10.1177/1524839907302210
Process evaluation in an intervention designed to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening in a VA medical center
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the United States. Although CRC screening is recommended for individuals 50 years and older, screening completion rates are low. This can be attributed to provider and patient barriers. We developed an intervention to improve provider recommendation and patient screening among noncompliant male veterans in a 2-year randomized controlled trial and examined the relationship between participation and study outcomes among patients and providers. Overall, providers who attended intervention sessions recommended CRC screening during 64% of patient visits and providers who did not attend any intervention sessions recommended screening during 54% of visits (p < .01). Patients of providers who attended intervention sessions also were more likely to be screened (42% versus 29%, p < .05). The patient intervention did not have the desired impact. The subgroup of patients in the patient intervention was not more likely to complete CRC screening.
Similar articles
-
Health care provider-directed intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among veterans: results of a randomized controlled trial.J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 1;23(7):1548-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.049. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15735130 Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of patient-provider communication on colorectal cancer screening.Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):738-45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178935a. Med Care. 2008. PMID: 18580394
-
The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs.Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 13;166(20):2202-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.20.2202. Arch Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 17101937
-
Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States.Cancer Causes Control. 2008 May;19(4):339-59. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9100-y. Epub 2007 Dec 18. Cancer Causes Control. 2008. PMID: 18085415 Review.
-
Determinants of participation in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing.J Public Health (Oxf). 2010 Sep;32(3):395-405. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp115. Epub 2009 Dec 16. J Public Health (Oxf). 2010. PMID: 20015868 Review.
Cited by
-
A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence.Ann Behav Med. 2011 Dec;42(3):294-303. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9291-z. Ann Behav Med. 2011. PMID: 21826576 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A computerized intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening for underserved populations: theoretical background and algorithm development.Technol Health Care. 2012;20(1):25-35. doi: 10.3233/THC-2011-0653. Technol Health Care. 2012. PMID: 22297711 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of a call-in centre to deliver colorectal cancer screening in primary care.Can Fam Physician. 2013 Dec;59(12):e550-7. Can Fam Physician. 2013. PMID: 24336560 Free PMC article.
-
Multilevel interventions: measurement and measures.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 May;2012(44):67-77. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs011. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012. PMID: 22623598 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline.Implement Sci. 2011 Sep 29;6:112. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-112. Implement Sci. 2011. PMID: 21958602 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical