Life support for patients without a surrogate decision maker: who decides?
- PMID: 17606959
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-1-200707030-00006
Life support for patients without a surrogate decision maker: who decides?
Abstract
Background: Physicians in intensive care units have withdrawn life support in incapacitated patients who lack surrogate decision makers and advance directives, yet little is known about how often this occurs or under what circumstances.
Objective: To determine the proportion of deaths in intensive care units that occur in patients who lack decision-making capacity and a surrogate and the process that physicians use to make these decisions.
Design: Multicenter, prospective cohort study.
Setting: Intensive care units of 7 medical centers in 2004 to 2005.
Patients: 3011 consecutive critically ill adults.
Measurements: Attending physicians completed a questionnaire about the decision-making process for each incapacitated patient without a surrogate or advance directive for whom they considered limiting life support.
Results: Overall, 5.5% (25 of 451 patients) of deaths in intensive care units occurred in incapacitated patients who lacked a surrogate decision maker and an advance directive. This percentage ranged from 0% to 27% across the 7 centers. Physicians considered limiting life support in 37 such patients or would have considered it if a surrogate had been available. In 6 patients, there was prospective hospital review of the decision, and in 1 patient, there was court review. In the remaining 30 patients, the decision was made by the intensive care unit team alone or by the intensive care unit team plus another attending physician. The authors found wide variability in hospital policies, professional society guidelines, and state laws regarding who should make life-support decisions for this patient population. Thirty-six of 37 life-support decisions were made in a manner inconsistent with American College of Physicians guidelines for judicial review.
Limitations: The results are based on physicians' self-reported practices and may not match actual practices. The number of incapacitated patients without surrogates in the study is small.
Conclusions: Incapacitated patients without surrogates accounted for approximately 1 in 20 deaths in intensive care units. Most life-support decisions were made by physicians without institutional or judicial review.
Similar articles
-
Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2053-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000227654.38708.C1. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16763515
-
Are physicians' recommendations to limit life support beneficial or burdensome? Bringing empirical data to the debate.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Aug 15;180(4):320-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200811-1776OC. Epub 2009 Jun 4. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19498057 Free PMC article.
-
An empirical study of surrogates' preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr 1;183(7):915-21. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201008-1214OC. Epub 2010 Oct 29. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011. PMID: 21037019 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of statutory limitations on the authority of substitute decision makers on the care of patients in the intensive care unit: case examples and review of state laws affecting withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment.J Intensive Care Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):71-80. doi: 10.1177/0885066611433551. Epub 2012 Jan 17. J Intensive Care Med. 2014. PMID: 22257784 Review.
-
A model for emergency department end-of-life communications after acute devastating events--part I: decision-making capacity, surrogates, and advance directives.Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):E1068-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01426.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 22978734 Review.
Cited by
-
Can the Communion of Saints Help the Search for Justice in Dying well (Enough), "In Abraham's Arms, Where Lazarus is Poor no Longer"?Linacre Q. 2013 Nov;80(4):323-362. doi: 10.1179/2050854913Y.0000000014. Epub 2013 Nov 1. Linacre Q. 2013. PMID: 30083012 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical Challenges in Caring for Unrepresented Adults: A Qualitative Study of Key Stakeholders.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Aug;67(8):1724-1729. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15957. Epub 2019 May 6. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019. PMID: 31059129 Free PMC article.
-
Timing of limitations in life support in acute lung injury patients: a multisite study*.Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):296-302. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a272db. Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 23989178 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients.J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Jun;14(2):241-250. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9773-1. Epub 2017 Mar 6. J Bioeth Inq. 2017. PMID: 28265798 Free PMC article.
-
Policies for Mandatory Ethics Consultations at U.S. Academic Teaching Hospitals: A Multisite Survey Study.Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;48(6):847-853. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004343. Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32317595 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources