Uptake of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests in women after detection of soft markers for chromosomal abnormality on ultrasonographic evaluation
- PMID: 17611609
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211787
Uptake of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests in women after detection of soft markers for chromosomal abnormality on ultrasonographic evaluation
Abstract
Objective: Use of soft ultrasonographic markers during routine prenatal ultrasonography (USG) may be used for the screening of aneuploidy in the low-risk population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of an invasive test for prenatal diagnosis and to assess the role of various factors in the decision-making regarding an invasive test when confronted with risk for aneuploidy after a soft marker is detected on routine antenatal ultrasonogram.
Study design: Women were referred for USG in our department by primary obstetricians for indications such as a previous child with a congenital malformation, genetic disorder, stillbirth or in women with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Some of the women were referred after prenatal detection of a soft marker on USG. They were screened for soft markers associated with chromosomal abnormality. They were counseled regarding the age-specific risk and the risk of aneuploidy after detection of a marker in comparison to the general population's risk of Down's syndrome. They were also counseled regarding the risk of a procedure-related abortion (0.5%) following an invasive procedure before their decision regarding the use of amniocentesis was made.
Result: Twenty women out of 50 (40%) opted for amniocentesis. Except in one case of trisomy 21 in a fetus with short femur and humerus, all others had normal karyotype. The uptake of the test was comparable between primigravida (33%), women with poor obstetric history (46%) and women with at least one normal live child (45%). There was no statistical difference in the uptake of invasive test based on gestational age as well. Uptake of amniocentesis was higher (78%) in cases with nuchal thickening as compared to other markers (35%).
Conclusion: Ultrasonographic detection of soft markers is associated with a high frequency of uptake for invasive prenatal testing. Increased nuchal thickening is associated with a higher acceptance of amniocentesis. Maternal age, gestational age or previous obstetric history were not associated with the decision to undergo amniocentesis.
Similar articles
-
Factors affecting the decision regarding amniocentesis in women at genetic risk because of age 35 years or older.Prenat Diagn. 2002 Sep;22(9):769-74. doi: 10.1002/pd.405. Prenat Diagn. 2002. PMID: 12224068
-
[Value of detection of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma in the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Nov;47(11):808-12. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012. PMID: 23302119 Chinese.
-
Anxiety and prenatal testing: do women with soft ultrasound findings have increased anxiety compared to women with other indications for testing?Prenat Diagn. 2008 Feb;28(2):135-40. doi: 10.1002/pd.1935. Prenat Diagn. 2008. PMID: 18236427
-
Ultrasound-adjusted risk and spectrum of fetal chromosomal abnormality in women with elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein.Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun;85(6):952-6. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00077-5. Obstet Gynecol. 1995. PMID: 7539525 Review.
-
[Prenatal investigations for Down's syndrome: medical-technical considerations and dilemmas arising from current screening methods].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Oct 30;148(44):2166-71. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004. PMID: 15559409 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 16;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1812-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 29769050 Free PMC article.
-
Swedish University Students' Opinion Regarding Information About Soft Markers.J Genet Couns. 2016 Feb;25(1):146-56. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9852-6. Epub 2015 Jul 12. J Genet Couns. 2016. PMID: 26163102
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical