Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment
- PMID: 17611744
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1017-x
Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment
Abstract
This study investigated differences in adaptation to a novel dynamic environment between the dominant and nondominant arms in 16 naive, right-handed, neurologically intact subjects. Subjects held onto the handle of a robotic manipulandum and executed reaching movements within a horizontal plane following a pseudo-random sequence of targets. Curl field perturbations were imposed by the robot motors, and we compared the rate and quality of adaptation between dominant and nondominant arms. During the early phase of the adaptation time course, the rate of motor adaptation between both arms was similar, but the mean peak and figural error of the nondominant arm were significantly smaller than those of the dominant arm. Also, the nondominant limb's aftereffects were significantly smaller than in the dominant arm. Thus, the controller of the nondominant limb appears to have relied on impedance control to a greater degree than the dominant limb when adapting to a novel dynamic environment. The results of this study imply that there are differences in dynamic adaptation between an individual's two arms.
Similar articles
-
Laterality effects in motor learning by mental practice in right-handers.Neuroscience. 2015 Jun 25;297:231-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.02.055. Epub 2015 Mar 19. Neuroscience. 2015. PMID: 25797464
-
Feedforward compensation for novel dynamics depends on force field orientation but is similar for the left and right arms.J Neurophysiol. 2016 Nov 1;116(5):2260-2271. doi: 10.1152/jn.00425.2016. Epub 2016 Aug 31. J Neurophysiol. 2016. PMID: 27582293 Free PMC article.
-
Trans-radial upper extremity amputees are capable of adapting to a novel dynamic environment.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jul;188(4):589-601. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1394-9. Epub 2008 Apr 29. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18443766
-
Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm.J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jan;89(1):168-76. doi: 10.1152/jn.00622.2002. J Neurophysiol. 2003. PMID: 12522169
-
Handedness: differential specializations for control of trajectory and position.Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005 Oct;33(4):206-13. doi: 10.1097/00003677-200510000-00010. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005. PMID: 16239839 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Specialization in interlimb transfer between dominant and non-dominant hand skills.J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jun;27(6):1731-3. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1731. Epub 2015 Jun 30. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015. PMID: 26180308 Free PMC article.
-
Modulation of internal model formation during force field-induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex.J Physiol. 2009 Jun 15;587(Pt 12):2949-61. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.169284. Epub 2009 Apr 29. J Physiol. 2009. PMID: 19403605 Free PMC article.
-
Emerging Trends in the Multimodal Nature of Cognition: Touch and Handedness.Front Psychol. 2017 May 26;8:844. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00844. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28603509 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke.Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jun;22(6):1407-19. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr237. Epub 2011 Aug 30. Cereb Cortex. 2012. PMID: 21878488 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Postural control of arm and fingers through integration of movement commands.Elife. 2020 Feb 11;9:e52507. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52507. Elife. 2020. PMID: 32043973 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources