Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jun;78(3):404-11.
doi: 10.1080/17453670710013997.

In vitro comparison of Refobacin-Palacos R with Refobacin Bone Cement and Palacos R + G

Affiliations
Comparative Study

In vitro comparison of Refobacin-Palacos R with Refobacin Bone Cement and Palacos R + G

Graham F Dall et al. Acta Orthop. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Refobacin Palacos R (RPR) is no longer produced and Palacos R + G (PRG) and Refobacin Bone Cement R (RBC) have been introduced to supersede it. We performed an in vitro study to ascertain whether the handling and mechanical properties of the more recent cement preparations are different to those of their predecessor.

Methods: The 3 cements were tested to ISO 5833 and German DIN 53435 standards. In addition, their gentamicin elution, shrinkage, viscosity, and handling characteristics were studied.

Results: All 3 cements had comparable mechanical properties exceeding the ISO 5833 and DIN 53435 standards. They eluted similar amounts of gentamicin and had comparable shrinkage. In the batches tested, RBC showed statistically significantly longer handling curves. Both PRG and RBC had statistically significantly lower viscosities as they cured compared to their predecessor.

Interpretation: Surgeons must be aware that both successor cements do not appear to have handling curves and viscoelastic properties identical to those of RPR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources