For whom the mind wanders, and when: an experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life
- PMID: 17614870
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01948.x
For whom the mind wanders, and when: an experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life
Abstract
An experience-sampling study of 124 undergraduates, pretested on complex memory-span tasks, examined the relation between working memory capacity (WMC) and the experience of mind wandering in daily life. Over 7 days, personal digital assistants signaled subjects eight times daily to report immediately whether their thoughts had wandered from their current activity, and to describe their psychological and physical context. WMC moderated the relation between mind wandering and activities' cognitive demand. During challenging activities requiring concentration and effort, higher-WMC subjects maintained on-task thoughts better, and mind-wandered less, than did lower-WMC subjects. The results were therefore consistent with theories of WMC emphasizing the role of executive attention and control processes in determining individual differences and their cognitive consequences.
Similar articles
-
Working memory capacity does not always support future-oriented mind-wandering.Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Mar;67(1):41-50. doi: 10.1037/a0031252. Can J Exp Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23458550
-
Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment.Psychol Sci. 2008 Jun;19(6):549-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02122.x. Psychol Sci. 2008. PMID: 18578844
-
Individual differences in working memory capacity and distractor processing: possible contribution of top-down inhibitory control.Brain Res. 2010 Jun 4;1335:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.088. Epub 2010 Apr 8. Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20381462
-
Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: a latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage.Memory. 2009 Aug;17(6):635-54. doi: 10.1080/09658210902998047. Epub 2009 Jun 17. Memory. 2009. PMID: 19536691 Review.
-
A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1282-1311. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1220-5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 28108977 Review.
Cited by
-
Enhancing SART Validity by Statistically Controlling Speed-Accuracy Trade-Offs.Front Psychol. 2013 May 13;4:265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00265. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23717295 Free PMC article.
-
Interoceptive attention and mood in daily life: an experience-sampling study.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Aug 26;379(1908):20230256. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0256. Epub 2024 Jul 15. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39005033 Free PMC article.
-
Individual differences in working memory capacity and the regulation of arousal.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Oct;82(7):3273-3290. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02077-0. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020. PMID: 32651927
-
Spontaneous future cognitions: an integrative review.Psychol Res. 2019 Jun;83(4):651-665. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1127-z. Epub 2018 Dec 10. Psychol Res. 2019. PMID: 30535833 Review.
-
The Influence of Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability on Working Memory Training Gains.J Cogn Enhanc. 2019 Jun;3(2):174-185. doi: 10.1007/s41465-018-0111-2. Epub 2018 Nov 16. J Cogn Enhanc. 2019. PMID: 31595266 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources