Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec;66(12):1669-71.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.072561. Epub 2007 Jul 6.

A modification of the Omeract RA MRI score for erosions for use with an extremity MRI system with reduced field of view

Affiliations

A modification of the Omeract RA MRI score for erosions for use with an extremity MRI system with reduced field of view

Jane E Freeston et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and test the reliability of a modified version of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score (RAMRIS) for erosions using extremity MRI (eMRI) with reduced field of view (RAMRIS-RV).

Methods: Using a MagneVu 0.2 T machine, the preliminary RAMRIS-RV assessed erosions in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints 2-3, bases of metacarpal (MC) 2-5, and all wrist bones excluding base MC 1, pisiform and trapezium. T1 weighted images of >/=500 MCP and wrist bony sites from a mixed severity RA and control cohort were evaluated. An inter-reader reliability study evaluating 300 wrist and 160 MCP bony sites was then performed.

Results: Mean per cent exact (and close) agreement results were as follows: MCP proximal sites 83.5 (96.2), MCP distal 54.4 (77.2), bases MC 2-4 85.2 (96.7), carpal bones 79.0 (92.1), distal radius/ulna 66.4 (87.8). The base of MCP 5 was visualised in </=50% cases (13/25) and was removed from the final RAMRIS-RV.

Conclusions: The RAMRIS-RV is a practical tool that can be used with eMRI with a reduced field of view. This study shows excellent inter-reader reliability for erosion assessment, albeit in a reduced number of bony sites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Conaghan P G, McQueen F M, Peterfy C G, Lassere M N, Ejbjerg B, Bird P.et al The evidence for magnetic resonance imaging as an outcome measure in proof‐of‐concept rheumatoid arthritis studies. J Rheumatol 2005322465–2469. - PubMed
    1. Ostergaard M, Hansen M, Stoltenberg M, Jensen K E, Szkudlarek M, Pedersen‐Zbinden B.et al New radiographic bone erosions in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis are detectable with magnetic resonance imaging a median of two years earlier. Arthritis Rheum 2003482128–2131. - PubMed
    1. Perry D, Stewart N, Benton N, Robinson E, Yeoman S, Crabbe J.et al Detection of erosions in the rheumatoid hand; a comparative study of multidetector computerized tomography versus magnetic resonance scanning. J Rheumatol 200532256–267. - PubMed
    1. Dohn U M, Ejbjerg B J, Court‐Payen M, Hasselquist M, Narvestad E, Szkudlarek M.et al Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthritis Res Ther 20068R110 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen S, Deodhar A, Kavanaugh A, Potter H H, Ruderman E, Shmerling R H.et al for the American College of Rheumatology Extremity Magnetic Resonance Imaging Task Force. Extremity magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: report of the American College of Rheumatology Extremity Magnetic Resonance Imaging Task Force. Arthritis Rheum 2006541034–1047. - PubMed

Publication types