Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep;16(7):1203-10.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9232-2. Epub 2007 Jul 7.

Clinically meaningful improvement on the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire in men with erectile dysfunction

Affiliations

Clinically meaningful improvement on the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire in men with erectile dysfunction

Joseph C Cappelleri et al. Qual Life Res. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the minimal clinically meaningful improvement (MCMI) on the Self-Esteem And Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire.

Methods: Using combined data from the 2 pivotal SEAR trials of men treated with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (ED), MCMIs were estimated as the lower limit of the 2-sided 95% confidence intervals of SEAR mean change scores (from baseline to end of study) for 2 anchor groups: (1) men who improved 1 ED severity category on the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function, and (2) men who improved 5-60% (inclusive) on these erectile function scores.

Results: Both anchors gave comparable results. A 10-point MCMI was proposed because the estimates of 95% lower bounds centered on around 10 points for most SEAR components (Sexual Relationship, Confidence, Self-Esteem, Overall Score). An exception was the Overall Relationship whose 95% lower bounds were too low to recommend them as an MCMI.

Conclusions: Two anchor-based approaches suggest that a change of about 10 points represents an MCMI on most components of the SEAR questionnaire.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):627-32; discussion 632 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Mar;55(3):285-95 - PubMed
    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Apr;77(4):371-83 - PubMed
    1. J Sex Med. 2006 May;3(3):521-9 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Nov;18(5):419-23 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources