Computer-aided systematized approach to pediatric ECG analysis
- PMID: 17617069
- PMCID: PMC6932167
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2007.00167.x
Computer-aided systematized approach to pediatric ECG analysis
Abstract
Background: In pediatric electrocardiography (ECG), the correct classification of segments in the medical record is subjected to various components. A conventional analysis based either on the cardiologist's skills or a quick reference to a standard normality table may lead to mistakes and to an incorrect final medical diagnosis. In this study, the evaluation of 12 specific ECG segments (ES) is defined as segmental analysis (SA). We hypothesized that a computer-aided SA can provide better results for a correct classification of pediatric ECGs, compared to the conventional analysis. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of a computer-aided SA ECG diagnosis of pediatric patients by cardiologists.
Methods: To validate the software, we selected four normal and one altered ECG as references, all with concordant reports given by two cardiologists using manual planimetry. Nineteen cardiology experts independently examined each of the five standard pediatric ECGs twice. First, the ECG was analyzed in the conventional form. Subsequently, the participants evaluated ECGs with our proposed computer-aided AS, by measuring the 12 specific ES in the grid paper and having their values entered into a custom-made software, in order to compare them with normality standards.
Results: The computer-aided SA reduced ECG misreading or ECG misinterpretation errors by 83%. It also showed a more uniform, high-quality analysis of all ES (minimum of 92% correctly reviewed segments from normal pediatric ECGs) by all the participant cardiologists.
Conclusions: We consider the computer-aided SA for ECG evaluation in pediatric cardiology an efficient and safe complementary method.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department.Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Dec;46(6):507-11. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.03.013. Epub 2005 Jun 13. Ann Emerg Med. 2005. PMID: 16308065
-
The emergency department versus the computer: which is the better electrocardiographer?Pediatr Cardiol. 2003 Jul-Aug;24(4):364-8. doi: 10.1007/s00246-002-0332-z. Epub 2002 Dec 4. Pediatr Cardiol. 2003. PMID: 12457259
-
Can Pediatric Practitioners Correctly Interpret Electrocardiograms?J Pediatr. 2019 Mar;206:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.10.077. Epub 2018 Dec 17. J Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 30573213
-
Competency in interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: a summary and appraisal of published evidence.Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 6;138(9):751-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-9-200305060-00013. Ann Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12729431 Review.
-
Eyewitness to history: Landmarks in the development of computerized electrocardiography.J Electrocardiol. 2016 Jan-Feb;49(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 6. J Electrocardiol. 2016. PMID: 26620728 Review.
References
-
- Bosisio IBJ. Aplicações clínicas do eletrocardiograma na criança. Revista SOCESP. 1999;3:277–285.
-
- Victorica BE. Interpretation of ECG and diagnostic value In Gessner IH, Victorica BE. (eds): Pediatric Cardiology: A Problem Oriented Approach, Chapter 3. Philadelphia , W.B. Saunders, 1993.
-
- Schwartz PJ, Garson A, Jr , Paul T, et al Guidelines for the interpretation of the neonatal electrocardiogram. Eur Heart Journal 2002;23:1329–1344. - PubMed
-
- Boccalandro I, Tranchesi J, Pillegi F, et al Eletrocardiograma normal nos diferentes grupos etários In Memórias del IV Congreso Mundial de Cardiologia (World Congress of Cardiology, 4th). Mexico City, México , 1963.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials