Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh
- PMID: 17617195
- PMCID: PMC2366022
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01338.x
Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the effects on pregnancy outcomes of the duration of the preceding interpregnancy interval (IPI) and type of pregnancy outcome that began the interval.
Design: Observational population-based study.
Setting: The Maternal Child Health-Family Planning (MCH-FP) area of Matlab, Bangladesh.
Population: A total of 66,759 pregnancy outcomes that occurred between 1982 and 2002.
Methods: Bivariate tabulations and multinomial logistic regression analysis.
Main outcome measures: Pregnancy outcomes (live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage [spontaneous fetal loss prior to 28 weeks], and induced abortion).
Results: When socio-economic and demographic covariates are controlled, of the IPIs that began with a live birth, those < 6 months in duration were associated with a 7.5-fold increase in the odds of an induced abortion (95% CI 6.0-9.4), a 3.3-fold increase in the odds of a miscarriage (95% CI 2.8-3.9), and a 1.6-fold increase in the odds of a stillbirth (95% CI 1.2-2.1) compared with 27- to 50-month IPIs. IPIs of 6-14 months were associated with increased odds of induced abortion (2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.6). IPIs > or = 75 months were associated with increased odds of all three types of non-live-birth (NLB) outcomes but were not as risky as very short intervals. IPIs that began with a NLB were generally more likely to end with the same type of NLB.
Conclusions: Women whose pregnancies are between 15 and 75 months after a preceding pregnancy outcome (regardless of its type) have a lower likelihood of fetal loss than those with shorter or longer IPIs. Those with a preceding NLB outcome deserve special attention in counselling and monitoring.
Similar articles
-
Interpregnancy Interval and Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Register-Based Study of 328,577 Pregnancies in Denmark 1994-2010.Matern Child Health J. 2018 Jul;22(7):1008-1015. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2480-7. Matern Child Health J. 2018. PMID: 29423584
-
Interpregnancy interval after live birth or pregnancy termination and estimated risk of preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study.BJOG. 2016 Nov;123(12):2009-2017. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14165. Epub 2016 Jul 13. BJOG. 2016. PMID: 27405702
-
Pregnancy intervals after stillbirth, neonatal death and spontaneous abortion and the risk of an adverse outcome in the next pregnancy in rural Bangladesh.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Feb 9;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2203-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 30738434 Free PMC article.
-
Is there an ideal interpregnancy interval after a live birth, miscarriage or other adverse pregnancy outcomes?J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Feb;30(2):107-10. doi: 10.3109/01443610903470288. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010. PMID: 20143964 Review.
-
Interpregnancy interval and risk of perinatal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BJOG. 2020 Nov;127(12):1470-1479. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16303. Epub 2020 Jun 16. BJOG. 2020. PMID: 32378279
Cited by
-
Prevalence of stillbirth and its associated factors in East Africa: generalized linear mixed modeling.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03883-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 34078299 Free PMC article.
-
Influences on pregnancy-termination decisions in Matlab, Bangladesh.Demography. 2013 Oct;50(5):1739-64. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0202-8. Demography. 2013. PMID: 23640158
-
Factors associated with postpartum family planning use in Rwanda.Contracept Reprod Med. 2024 Jan 2;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40834-023-00261-9. Contracept Reprod Med. 2024. PMID: 38167559 Free PMC article.
-
Planning for work: Exploring the relationship between contraceptive use and women's sector-specific employment in India.PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0248391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248391. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33705471 Free PMC article.
-
Opportunities lost: Barriers to increasing the use of effective contraception in the Philippines.PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0218187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218187. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31344054 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Rutstein SO, Johnson K, Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A. Washington, DC: Catalyst Consortium; 2005. Effect of Birth Spacing on Infant and Child Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Technical document.
-
- Khoshnood B, Lee KS, Wall S, Hsieh HL, Mittendorf R. Short interpregnancy intervals and the risk of adverse birth outcomes among five racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:798–805. - PubMed
-
- Greenspan A. Family planning's benefits include improved child health and nutrition: new data from Bangladesh. Asia Pac Pop Policy. 1993;(26):1–4. - PubMed
-
- Hosain GM, Chatterjee N, Begum A, Saha SC. Factors associated with low birthweight in rural Bangladesh. J Trop Pediatr. 2006;52:87–91. - PubMed
-
- Miller JE. Birth intervals and perinatal health—an investigation of 3 hypotheses. Fam Plann Perspect. 1991;23:62–70. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources