Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh
- PMID: 17617195
- PMCID: PMC2366022
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01338.x
Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the effects on pregnancy outcomes of the duration of the preceding interpregnancy interval (IPI) and type of pregnancy outcome that began the interval.
Design: Observational population-based study.
Setting: The Maternal Child Health-Family Planning (MCH-FP) area of Matlab, Bangladesh.
Population: A total of 66,759 pregnancy outcomes that occurred between 1982 and 2002.
Methods: Bivariate tabulations and multinomial logistic regression analysis.
Main outcome measures: Pregnancy outcomes (live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage [spontaneous fetal loss prior to 28 weeks], and induced abortion).
Results: When socio-economic and demographic covariates are controlled, of the IPIs that began with a live birth, those < 6 months in duration were associated with a 7.5-fold increase in the odds of an induced abortion (95% CI 6.0-9.4), a 3.3-fold increase in the odds of a miscarriage (95% CI 2.8-3.9), and a 1.6-fold increase in the odds of a stillbirth (95% CI 1.2-2.1) compared with 27- to 50-month IPIs. IPIs of 6-14 months were associated with increased odds of induced abortion (2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.6). IPIs > or = 75 months were associated with increased odds of all three types of non-live-birth (NLB) outcomes but were not as risky as very short intervals. IPIs that began with a NLB were generally more likely to end with the same type of NLB.
Conclusions: Women whose pregnancies are between 15 and 75 months after a preceding pregnancy outcome (regardless of its type) have a lower likelihood of fetal loss than those with shorter or longer IPIs. Those with a preceding NLB outcome deserve special attention in counselling and monitoring.
References
-
- Rutstein SO, Johnson K, Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A. Washington, DC: Catalyst Consortium; 2005. Effect of Birth Spacing on Infant and Child Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Technical document.
-
- Khoshnood B, Lee KS, Wall S, Hsieh HL, Mittendorf R. Short interpregnancy intervals and the risk of adverse birth outcomes among five racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:798–805. - PubMed
-
- Greenspan A. Family planning's benefits include improved child health and nutrition: new data from Bangladesh. Asia Pac Pop Policy. 1993;(26):1–4. - PubMed
-
- Hosain GM, Chatterjee N, Begum A, Saha SC. Factors associated with low birthweight in rural Bangladesh. J Trop Pediatr. 2006;52:87–91. - PubMed
-
- Miller JE. Birth intervals and perinatal health—an investigation of 3 hypotheses. Fam Plann Perspect. 1991;23:62–70. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources