Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct;152(4):549-55.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707377. Epub 2007 Jul 9.

Nocistatin inhibits 5-hydroxytryptamine release in the mouse neocortex via presynaptic Gi/o protein linked pathways

Affiliations

Nocistatin inhibits 5-hydroxytryptamine release in the mouse neocortex via presynaptic Gi/o protein linked pathways

M Fantin et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Nocistatin (NST) is a neuropeptide generated from cleavage of the nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) precursor. Evidence has been presented that NST acts as a functional antagonist of N/OFQ, although NST receptor and transduction pathways have not yet been identified. We previously showed that N/OFQ inhibited [(3)H]5-hydroxytryptamine ([(3)H]5-HT) release from mouse cortical synaptosomes via activation of NOP receptors. We now investigate whether NST regulates [(3)H]5-HT release in the same preparation.

Experimental approach: Mouse and rat cerebrocortical synaptosomes in superfusion, preloaded with [(3)H]5-HT and stimulated with 1 min pulses of 10 mM KCl, were used.

Key results: Bovine NST (b-NST) inhibited the K(+)-induced [(3)H]5-HT release, displaying similar efficacy but lower potency than N/OFQ. b-NST action underwent concentration-dependent and time-dependent desensitization, and was not prevented either by the NOP receptor antagonist [Nphe(1) Arg(14),Lys(15)]N/OFQ(1-13)-NH(2) (UFP-101) or by the non-selective opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone. Contrary to N/OFQ, b-NST reduced [(3)H]5-HT release from synaptosomes obtained from NOP receptor knockout mice. However, both N/OFQ and NST were ineffective in synaptosomes pre-treated with the G(i/o) protein inhibitor, Pertussis toxin. NST-N/OFQ interactions were also investigated. Co-application of maximal concentrations of both peptides did not result in additive effects, whereas pre-application of maximal b-NST concentrations partially attenuated N/OFQ inhibition.

Conclusions and implications: We conclude that b-NST inhibits [(3)H]5-HT release via activation of G(i/o) protein linked pathways, not involving classical opioid receptors and the NOP receptor. The present data strengthen the view that b-NST is, per se, a biologically active peptide endowed with agonist activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) and bovine nocistatin (b-NST) inhibit [3H]5-HT overflow from cortical synaptosomes. Concentration–response curves describing the effects of N/OFQ (0.001–10 μM) and b-NST (0.001–10 μM) on the K+-evoked [3H]5-HT overflow from mouse (a) and rat (b) neocortical synaptosomes. Maximally effective b-NST concentrations were 1 μM (mouse) and 0.1 μM (rat; analysis of variance followed by the Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons). Drugs were perfused 9 min before K+ and maintained until the end of the experiment. Data are expressed as percentage of the K+ stimulation (control) and are means±s.e.m. of 10–20 determinations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time dependency of the bovine nocistatin (b-NST) effect. Effect of b-NST (1 μM) on the K+-evoked [3H]5-HT overflow in neocortical mouse synaptosomes. b-NST was applied for 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 min before K+ and maintained until the end of the experiment. Data are expressed as percentage of the K+ stimulation (control) and are means±s.e.m. of eight experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01; different from control (analysis of variance followed by the Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The effect of bovine nocistatin (b-NST) is mediated by neither classical opioid nor N/OFQ opioid peptide (NOP) receptors. (a) Effect of the non-selective opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1 μM) and the NOP selective receptor antagonist [Nphe1, Arg14, Lys15]N/OFQ(1–13)-NH2 (UFP-101; 1 μM) on the inhibition of K+-evoked [3H]5-HT overflow induced by b-NST (1 μM) in neocortical mouse synaptosomes. Antagonists were perfused 3 min before b-NST and maintained until the end of the experiment. (b) Effect of b-NST (1 μM) and N/OFQ (0.1 μM) on the K+-evoked [3H]5-HT overflow from neocortical synaptosomes obtained from wild-type (NOP+/+) and NOP receptor knockout (NOP−/−) mice. Data are expressed as percentage of the K+ stimulation (control) and are means±s.e.m. of 8–12 determinations. *P<0.05; **P<0.01, different from control (analysis of variance followed by the Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The effects of bovine nocistatin (b-NST) and nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) are prevented by Pertussis toxin (PTX). Effect of pretreatment with PTX (5 nM) on the inhibition of K+-evoked [3H]5-HT overflow induced by b-NST (1 μM) and N/OFQ (0.1 μM) in mouse neocortical synaptosomes. Data are expressed as percentage of the K+ stimulation (control) and are means±s.e.m. of 8–12 determinations. *P<0.05; different from control (analysis of variance followed by the Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) and bovine nocistatin (b-NST) interacted in modulating [3H]5-HT overflow. Effect of co-application (a) or pre-application (b) of maximal b-NST (1 μM) and N/OFQ (0.1 μM) concentrations on the K+-evoked [3H]5-HT overflow. (a) Drugs were co-applied 9 min before K+ and maintained until the end of the experiment. (b) b-NST and N/OFQ were applied 18 and 9 min before K+, respectively. Data are expressed as percentage of the K+ stimulation (control) and are means±s.e.m. of 12 (a) or 10 (b) determinations. *P<0.05, **P<0.01; different from control. °P<0.05; different from N/OFQ (analysis of variance followed by the Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons).

Comment in

  • Towards a receptor for nocistatin?
    Johnson EE, Connor M. Johnson EE, et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2007 Oct;152(4):415-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707384. Epub 2007 Jul 9. Br J Pharmacol. 2007. PMID: 17618302 Free PMC article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmadi S, Kotalla C, Guhring H, Takeshima H, Pahl A, Zeilhofer HU. Modulation of synaptic transmission by nociceptin/orphanin FQ and nocistatin in the spinal cord dorsal horn of mutant mice lacking the nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2001;59:612–618. - PubMed
    1. Albrecht D, Bluhdorn R, Siegmund H, Berger H, Calo G. Inhibitory action of nociceptin/orphanin FQ on functionally different thalamic neurons in urethane-anaesthetized rats. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;134:333–342. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amano T, Matsubayashi H, Tamura Y, Takahashi T. Orphanin FQ-induced outward current in rat hippocampus. Brain Res. 2000;853:269–274. - PubMed
    1. Brown P, Molliver ME. Dual serotonin (5-HT) projections to the nucleus accumbens core and shell: relation of the 5-HT transporter to amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity. J Neurosci. 2000;20:1952–1963. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calo G, Guerrini R, Bigoni R, Rizzi A, Bianchi C, Regoli D, et al. Structure–activity study of the nociceptin(1-13)-NH2 N-terminal tetrapeptide and discovery of a nociceptin receptor antagonist. J Med Chem. 1998;41:3360–3366. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms