Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others
- PMID: 17619223
- PMCID: PMC2219771
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0252-y
Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others
Abstract
Background: A majority of end-of-life medical decisions are made by surrogate decision-makers who have varying degrees of preparation and comfort with their role. Having a seriously ill family member is stressful for surrogates. Moreover, most clinicians have had little training in working effectively with surrogates.
Objectives: To better understand the challenges of decision-making from the surrogate's perspective.
Design: Semistructured telephone interview study of the experience of surrogate decision-making.
Participants: Fifty designated surrogates with previous decision-making experience.
Approach: We asked surrogates to describe and reflect on their experience of making medical decisions for others. After coding transcripts, we conducted a content analysis to identify and categorize factors that made decision-making more or less difficult for surrogates.
Results: Surrogates identified four types of factors: (1) surrogate characteristics and life circumstances (such as coping strategies and competing responsibilities), (2) surrogates' social networks (such as intrafamily discord about the "right" decision), (3) surrogate-patient relationships and communication (such as difficulties with honoring known preferences), and (4) surrogate-clinician communication and relationship (such as interacting with a single physician whom the surrogate recognizes as the clinical spokesperson vs. many clinicians).
Conclusions: These data provide insights into the challenges that surrogates encounter when making decisions for loved ones and indicate areas where clinicians could intervene to facilitate the process of surrogate decision-making. Clinicians may want to include surrogates in advance care planning prior to decision-making, identify and address surrogate stressors during decision-making, and designate one person to communicate information about the patient's condition, prognosis, and treatment options.
Similar articles
-
Making decisions for hospitalized older adults: ethical factors considered by family surrogates.J Clin Ethics. 2013 Summer;24(2):125-34. J Clin Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23923811 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Nov;54(11):1688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00911.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006. PMID: 17087695
-
Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making.J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Mar;23(3):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0487-7. Epub 2008 Jan 3. J Gen Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18172738 Free PMC article.
-
A model for emergency department end-of-life communications after acute devastating events--part I: decision-making capacity, surrogates, and advance directives.Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):E1068-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01426.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 22978734 Review.
-
Uncertainty in surrogate decision-making about end-of-life care for people with dementia: An integrative review.J Adv Nurs. 2024 Aug;80(8):3103-3118. doi: 10.1111/jan.16038. Epub 2024 Jan 10. J Adv Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38197503 Review.
Cited by
-
Advance care planning beyond advance directives: perspectives from patients and surrogates.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Sep;46(3):355-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Nov 27. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013. PMID: 23200188 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative Advance Care Planning for Older Adults Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Apr;39(4):406-412. doi: 10.1177/10499091211020276. Epub 2021 May 28. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022. PMID: 34047202 Free PMC article.
-
The facilitated values history: helping surrogates make authentic decisions for incapacitated patients with advanced illness.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep 15;186(6):480-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201204-0710CP. Epub 2012 Jul 19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22822020 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Leveraging In-Home Supportive Services Programs to Engage People in Advance Care Planning: Input from Staff, Providers, and Client Stakeholders.J Palliat Med. 2019 Nov;22(11):1430-1438. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0429. Epub 2019 Oct 9. J Palliat Med. 2019. PMID: 31596644 Free PMC article.
-
Utilization of EHR to Improve Support Person Engagement in Health Care for Patients With Chronic Conditions.J Patient Exp. 2022 Feb 9;9:23743735221077528. doi: 10.1177/23743735221077528. eCollection 2022. J Patient Exp. 2022. PMID: 35155752 Free PMC article.
References
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10633283', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10633283/'}]}
- Hiltunen EF, Medich C, Chase S, Peterson L, Forrow L. Family decision making and end-of-life treatment: The SUPPORT nurse narratives. J Clin Ethics. 1999;10(2):126–34. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1176/appi.ajgp.10.2.151', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajgp.10.2.151'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11925276', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11925276/'}]}
- Kim SYH, Karlawish JHT, Caine ED. Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;10(2):151–65. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '7387025', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7387025/'}]}
- Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Information and participation preference among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92(6):832–6. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1177/073346489801700208', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1177/073346489801700208'}]}
- Cicirelli VG. Views of elderly people concerning end-of-life decisions. J Appl Gerontol. 1998;17(2):186–203.
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1001/jama.277.18.1485', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.277.18.1485'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '9145723', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9145723/'}]}
- Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1997;277(18):1485–92. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical