Pigeons discriminate continuous versus discontinuous line segments
- PMID: 17620026
- DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.3.273
Pigeons discriminate continuous versus discontinuous line segments
Abstract
Three experiments examined various facets of the perception of continuous and discontinuous line segments in pigeons. Pigeons were presented with 2 straight lines that were interrupted by a gap. In some instances, the lines were the same angle and were positioned so that they appeared (to human observers) to form a continuous line. In other instances, the lines were different angles or the same angle but spatially misaligned. The birds were trained to classify each stimulus as continuous or discontinuous using a go/no-go procedure. A series of tests followed in which the birds received novel discontinuous displays made up of familiar line segments, continuous and discontinuous stimuli made up of novel line segments (novel straight lines or curved lines), and familiar displays in which the gap was covered with a gray square. Results from the tests indicated that 2 of the 3 pigeons had learned a continuous-discontinuous categorization and that they appeared to use the relationship between the 2 line segments in discriminating the displays.
((c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
Processing of biological motion point-light displays by baboons (Papio papio).J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Oct;33(4):381-91. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.381. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007. PMID: 17924787
-
A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):391-405. doi: 10.1037/a0016216. J Comp Psychol. 2009. PMID: 19929108
-
The role of video coherence on object-based motion discriminations by pigeons.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jul;33(3):287-98. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.3.287. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007. PMID: 17620027
-
Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera.Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):257-70. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0032-9. Epub 2006 Aug 15. Anim Cogn. 2006. PMID: 16909238 Review.
-
Visual complexity: a review.Psychol Bull. 2006 Jan;132(1):73-97. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.73. Psychol Bull. 2006. PMID: 16435958 Review.
Cited by
-
Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2015;10:73-105. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2015.100004. Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2015. PMID: 26207154 Free PMC article.
-
Odour generalisation and detection dog training.Anim Cogn. 2024 Nov 1;27(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01907-0. Anim Cogn. 2024. PMID: 39485633 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tracking of unpredictable moving stimuli by pigeons.Learn Behav. 2020 Mar;48(1):27-40. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00412-x. Learn Behav. 2020. PMID: 32016829 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous