Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Dec;35(6):763-76.
doi: 10.1177/1090198107303251. Epub 2007 Jul 9.

Do social network characteristics predict mammography screening practices?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Do social network characteristics predict mammography screening practices?

Jennifer D Allen et al. Health Educ Behav. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Many breast cancer outreach programs assume that dissemination of information through social networks and provision of social support will promote screening. The authors prospectively examined the relationship between social network characteristics and adherence to screening guidelines.

Method: Employed women age 40 years and older completed baseline and 2-year follow-up assessments (N=1,475) as part of an intervention trial. The authors modeled screening adherence at follow-up as a function of social network characteristics at baseline.

Results: Baseline adherence explained most of the variation in adherence at follow-up. For women age 40 to 51 years, having a mammogram at follow-up was predicted by encouragement by family and/or friends and subjective norms at baseline (odds ratio=2.20 and 1.18, respectively). For women age 52 years and older, the perception that screening was normative was related to adherence at follow-up (odds ratio=1.46).

Conclusions: Previous mammography use is strongly predictive of future screening. Social network characteristics have a modest impact on screening. Outreach efforts should focus on those who have previously underutilized mammography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curbow B, Bowie J, Garza MA, McDonnell K, Benz Scott L, Coyne CA, Chiappelli T. Community-based cancer screening programs in older populations: Making progress but can we do better? Preventive Medicine. 2004;38(6):676–693. - PubMed
    1. Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, Rimer BK. The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically low rates of cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2002;11:59–71. - PubMed
    1. Brownstein JN, Cheal N, Ackermann SP, Bassford TL, Campos-Outcalt D. Breast and cervical cancer screening in minority populations: A case for using lay health educators. Journal of Cancer Education. 1992;7(4):321–326. - PubMed
    1. Earp JA, Viadro CI, Vincus AA, Alpeter M, Flax V, Mayne L, Eng E. Lay health advisors: A strategy for getting the word out about breast cancer. Health Education and Behavior. 1997;24(4):432–451. - PubMed
    1. Suarez L, Ramirez AG, Villarreal R, Marti J, McAlister AL, Talavera GA, Trapido E, Perez-Stable EJ. Social networks and cancer screening in four U.S. Hispanic groups. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2000;19(1):47–52. - PubMed

Publication types