Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jul 1;63(Pt 7):568-70.
doi: 10.1107/S174430910702533X. Epub 2007 Jun 11.

The complex between SOS3 and SOS2 regulatory domain from Arabidopsis thaliana: cloning, expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis

Affiliations

The complex between SOS3 and SOS2 regulatory domain from Arabidopsis thaliana: cloning, expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis

María José Sánchez-Barrena et al. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. .

Abstract

The salt-tolerance genes SOS3 (salt overly sensitive 3) and SOS2 (salt overly sensitive 2) regulatory domain of Arabidopsis thaliana were cloned into a polycistronic plasmid and the protein complex was expressed in Escherichia coli, allowing purification to homogeneity in three chromatographic steps. Crystals were grown using vapour-diffusion techniques. The crystals belonged to space group P2(1)2(1)2(1), with unit-cell parameters a = 44.14, b = 57.39, c = 141.90 A.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Expression and purification of the SOS3Δ15–SOS2T1 complex. Lane 1, flowthrough from the anion-exchange column. Lane 2, flowthrough from the cation-exchange column. Lane 3, the fraction eluted with 125 mM NaCl buffer from the cation-exchange column. Lane 4, the main peak from the permeability column. Proteins were analyzed using 15% SDS–PAGE gels. Gels were stained using Coomassie Brilliant Blue.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Gel-filtration chromatography of SOS3Δ15–SOS2T1. The line shows the absorbance recorded at 280 nm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) SOS3Δ15–SOS2T1 crystals grown in 20%(w/v) PEG 4000, 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8.5, 0.2 M lithium sulfate. (b) Effect of ethylene glycol and guanidine–HCl on the crystals used in the study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–­763. - PubMed
    1. Guo, Y., Halfter, U., Ishitani, M. & & Zhu, J. K. (2001). Plant Cell, 13, 1383–1399. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halfter, U., Ishitani, M. & Zhu, J. K. (2000). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 3735–3740. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harmon, A. C., Gribskov, M. & Harper, J. F. (2000). Trends Plant Sci.5, 154–­159. - PubMed
    1. Ishitani, M., Liu, J., Halfter, U., Kim, C. S., Shi, W. & Zhu, J. K. (2000). Plant Cell, 12, 1667–1678. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances