Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S41-51.
doi: 10.1002/mpr.216.

Dimensionality and the category of major depressive episode

Affiliations
Review

Dimensionality and the category of major depressive episode

Gavin Andrews et al. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007.

Abstract

Major depressive episode (MDE) is a chronic disease typified by episodes that remit and recur. It is a major contributor to the burden of disease. The diagnosis of a disorder is an expert opinion that the disorder is present. The nine symptoms of MDE exist on dimensions of greater or lesser intensity, persistence over time, change in usual state, distress and impairment. It is the clinician's task to judge whether the elicited symptoms warrant the diagnosis. The surprise is that trained clinicians can do this reliably and that diagnostic interviews and questionnaires can emulate this process. The distribution of symptoms in community surveys is exponential, with no obvious discontinuity at the diagnostic threshold. Taxometric and primary care studies confirm this. The number of symptoms predicts severity, comorbidity, family history, disability, help seeking and treatment recommendations. The latent structure of mental disorders places MDE in the distress misery cluster. Measures of well-being, distress, disability and neuroticism correlate with the number of symptoms but the relation is not perfect. The Patient Health Questionnaire is derived from the diagnostic criteria and does not suffer this limitation. The introduction of measures like this would acknowledge dimensionality, would facilitate recognition, guide treatment, and be acceptable to consumers, providers and funders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altman E, Hedeker D, Peterson JL, Davis JM. The Altman Self‐Rating Mania Scale. Biol. Psychiatry 1997; 42: 948–55. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association (APA) . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition) (DSM‐IV). Washington, DC: APA, 1994.
    1. Andrews FM, Withey SB. Social Indicators of Well‐Being. New York: Plenum Press, 1976.
    1. Andrews G. Comorbidity and the general neurotic syndrome. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 168(Suppl.): 76–84. - PubMed
    1. Andrews G, Henderson S, Hall W. Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service utilisation. Overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey. Br J Psychiatry 2001; 178: 145–53. - PubMed